Comparison of Computerised Assessment of Breast Density with Subjective BI-RADS Classification and Tabar's Pattern from Two-View CR Mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Jamal, N. [1 ]
Ng, K-H [2 ]
Ranganathan, S. [2 ]
Tan, L. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agensi Nuklear Malaysia, Med Technol Div, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Biomed Imaging, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Computerised assessment; breast density; BI-RADS classification; Tabar's pattern; mammography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Computerised assessment, the objective classification of breast density provides a second opinion to the radiologist in classifying breast density. Subjective classification of breast density by the radiologist involves using: i) Wolfe's classification, ii) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, and iii) Tabar's pattern. The objective of this study was to compare the results of breast density obtained by using a computerised assessment technique with the subjective assessment by BI-RADS classification and Tabar's pattern from two-view computed radiography (CR) mammography. A computerised assessment technique to quantify breast density from two-view CR-mammography was developed using the MATLAB GUI applications that utilise basic MATLAB functionality. Hundred sets of CR-mammograms (from fifty cases) were initially classified by the radiologist (SR) into parenchymal patterns, according to BI-RADS schemes and Tabar's pattern. Median age of the patients was 53.3 years (range of 40-69 years). The radiologist then reanalysed the CR-mammograms using the computerised technique. The correlation between computerised results with BI-RADS classification and Tabar's pattern were analysed respectively. Classification performance of each class and pattern was also analysed. The breast density calculated using the computerised assessment technique correlated well with the subjective estimation of BI-RADS classification (0.82) and Tabar's pattern (0.95). The computerised assessment technique correctly classified 78.3% and 73.2% of the total cases based on BI-RADS classification and Tabar's pattern respectively. This computerised technique can he useful in providing a clinically accurate measurement of breast density and an assessment of future risk of developing breast cancer. This technique can also effectively assist in patient management.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] BI-RADS Density Classification From Areometric and Volumetric Automatic Breast Density Measurements
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine T.
    Brandal, Sid Helene B.
    Chaudhry, Khalida Nasreen
    Eben, Ellen
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Falk, Ragnhild Sorum
    Skaane, Per
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 468 - 478
  • [2] Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
    Giovanna Mariscotti
    Manuela Durando
    Nehmat Houssami
    Mirella Fasciano
    Alberto Tagliafico
    Davide Bosco
    Cristina Casella
    Camilla Bogetti
    Laura Bergamasco
    Paolo Fonio
    Giovanni Gandini
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 166 : 765 - 773
  • [3] Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience
    Eom, Hye-Joung
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kang, Ji-Won
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Han Jun
    Go, EunChae
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (05) : 527 - 532
  • [4] Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
    Mariscotti, Giovanna
    Durando, Manuela
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Fasciano, Mirella
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Bosco, Davide
    Casella, Cristina
    Bogetti, Camilla
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Fonio, Paolo
    Gandini, Giovanni
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (03) : 765 - 773
  • [5] A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas
    Ma, Yue
    Cao, Yang
    Liu, Aidi
    Yin, Lu
    Han, Peng
    Li, Haijie
    Zhang, Xiaohua
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 752 - 759
  • [6] Segmentation and Classification of Breast Masses From the Whole Mammography Images Using Transfer Learning and BI-RADS Characteristics
    Oudjer, Hayette
    Cherfa, Assia
    Cherfa, Yazid
    Belkhamsa, Noureddine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06)
  • [7] Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Gweon, Hye Mi
    Son, Eun Ju
    Kim, Jeong-Ah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (05) : 1056 - 1062
  • [8] Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories
    Singh, Tulika
    Sharma, Madhurima
    Singla, Veenu
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [9] Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas
    Ekpo, Ernest U.
    Ujong, Ujong Peter
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    McEntee, Mark F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (05) : 1119 - 1123
  • [10] Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories
    Tagliafico, A. S.
    Tagliafico, G.
    Cavagnetto, F.
    Calabrese, M.
    Houssami, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 86 (1031):