Neural substrates of cognitive control under the belief of getting neurofeedback training

被引:71
|
作者
Ninaus, Manuel [1 ]
Kober, Silvia E. [1 ]
Witte, Matthias [1 ]
Koschutnig, Karl [1 ]
Stangl, Matthias [2 ]
Neuper, Christa [1 ,3 ]
Wood, Guilherme [1 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ, Dept Psychol, Graz, Austria
[2] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis DZNE, Aging & Cognit Res Grp, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Knowledge Discovery, Lab Brain Comp Interfaces, A-8010 Graz, Austria
来源
关键词
cognitive control; anterior insula; neurofeedback; fMRI; self-awareness; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; DEFAULT NETWORK; INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SELF-REGULATION; ANGULAR GYRUS; ATTENTION; PERFORMANCE; RUMINATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00914
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Learning to modulate one's own brain activity is the fundament of neurofeedback (NF) applications. Besides the neural networks directly involved in the generation and modulation of the neurophysiological parameter being specifically trained, more general determinants of NF efficacy such as self-referential processes and cognitive control have been frequently disregarded. Nonetheless, deeper insight into these cognitive mechanisms and their neuronal underpinnings sheds light on various open NF related questions concerning individual differences, brain-computer interface (BCI) illiteracy as well as a more general model of NF learning. In this context, we investigated the neuronal substrate of these more general regulatory mechanisms that are engaged when participants believe that they are receiving NE Twenty healthy participants (40-63 years, 10 female) performed a sham NF paradigm during fMRI scanning. All participants were novices to NE-experiments and were instructed to voluntarily modulate their own brain activity based on a visual display of moving color bars. However, the bar depicted a recording and not the actual brain activity of participants. Reports collected at the end of the experiment indicate that participants were unaware of the sham feedback. In comparison to a passive watching condition, bilateral insula, anterior cingulate cortex and supplementary motor and dorsomedial and lateral prefrontal areas were activated when participants actively tried to control the bar. In contrast, when merely watching moving bars, increased activation in the left angular gyrus was observed. These results show that the intention to control a moving bar is sufficient to engage a broad frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular network involved in cognitive control. The results of the present study indicate that tasks such as those generally employed in NF training recruit the neuronal correlates of cognitive control even when only sham NF is presented.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Getting stress-related disorders under control: the untapped potential of neurofeedback
    Krause, Florian
    Linden, David E. J.
    Hermans, Erno J.
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2024, 47 (10) : 766 - 776
  • [3] The Effects of Different Theta and Beta Neurofeedback Training Protocols on Cognitive Control in ADHD
    Bluschke, Annet
    Eggert, Elena
    Friedrich, Julia
    Jamous, Roula
    Prochnow, Astrid
    Pscherer, Charlotte
    Schreiter, Marie Luise
    Teufert, Benjamin
    Roessner, Veit
    Beste, Christian
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT, 2022, 6 (04) : 463 - 477
  • [4] The Effects of Different Theta and Beta Neurofeedback Training Protocols on Cognitive Control in ADHD
    Annet Bluschke
    Elena Eggert
    Julia Friedrich
    Roula Jamous
    Astrid Prochnow
    Charlotte Pscherer
    Marie Luise Schreiter
    Benjamin Teufert
    Veit Roessner
    Christian Beste
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2022, 6 : 463 - 477
  • [5] The neural substrates of cognitive control in autism spectrum disorders
    Solomon, M.
    Ozonoff, S.
    Ursu, S.
    Ravizza, S.
    Cummings, N.
    Carter, C.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2007, 51 : 657 - 657
  • [6] Improving cognitive control: Is theta neurofeedback training associated with proactive rather than reactive control enhancement?
    Eschmann, Kathrin C. J.
    Mecklinger, Axel
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 (05)
  • [7] Multimodal Assessment of Neural Substrates in Computerized Cognitive Training: A Preliminary Study
    Na, Hae Ri
    Lim, Jae-Sung
    Kim, Woo Jung
    Jang, Jae-Won
    Baek, Min Jae
    Kim, Jeongeun
    Park, Young Ho
    Park, So Young
    Kim, SangYun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, 2018, 14 (04): : 454 - 463
  • [9] Resource sharing in cognitive control: Behavioral evidence and neural substrates
    Wu, Tingting
    Spagna, Alfredo
    Mackie, Melissa-Ann
    Fan, Jin
    NEUROIMAGE, 2023, 273
  • [10] Neurofeedback Training for Rifle Shooters to Improve Cognitive Ability
    Yisi Liu
    Subramaniam, Salem Chandrasekaran Harihara
    Sourina, Olga
    Shah, Eesha
    Chua, Joshua
    Ivanov, Kirill
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERWORLDS (CW), 2017, : 186 - 189