A Systematic Review of Learning Curves in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Procedures

被引:16
|
作者
Tapking, Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [4 ]
Hundeshagen, Gabriel [1 ]
Kneser, Ulrich [1 ]
Hirche, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Burn Ctr, BG Trauma Ctr Ludwigshafen, Dept Hand Plast & Reconstruct Surg,Microsurg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Shriners Hosp Children, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
learning curve; plastic surgery; reconstructive surgery; breast reconstruction; free flap; MICROSURGICAL SKILL-ACQUISITION; EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP; MICROVASCULAR FREE FLAPS; COOK-SWARTZ DOPPLER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; NECK RECONSTRUCTION; EXPERIENCE; RESIDENCY; OUTCOMES; HEAD;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002211
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical learning curves reflect the trainee's rate of progress in gaining skills and competence for new procedures. Complex interventions such as free tissue transfers, with various linked skills and competences, transferred to one procedure are likely to have steep learning curves. This work aimed to report influence of learning curves on outcomes such as success rate, operative time, and complication rates in plastic surgery procedures. Methods The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic database literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails) was performed. Articles were included when reporting effects of learning curves on outcomes in plastic surgery procedures. Results Twenty-nine articles focusing on learning curves in plastic surgery procedures were included. Studies reported on non-free flap breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and free flap reconstruction in general and for breast reconstruction and did not allow for pooling of the data because of heterogeneity. Most common outcomes for measuring improvements were success rate, operation time, and complication rate, which demonstrated improvements in almost all studies. Plateaus were reached in 45 to 100 cases for breast reconstructions and were not reported for other procedures. Only 2 studies did not find associations between surgical experience and clinical outcomes. Conclusions There are sparse data on learning curves in plastic surgery. Existing studies draw a heterogeneous picture, but especially free flap breast reconstructions seem to undergo learning curves with improvements in operative time, complication rates, and success rates. However, well-designed studies with clearly defined outcomes and comparison between surgeons of different levels over time should be performed. Systematic review registration:PROSPERO: CRD42018108634
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 331
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review
    Angelos Mantelakis
    Ankur Khajuria
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [2] The Clinical Applications of Machine Learning in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Mantelakis, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [3] The applications of machine learning in plastic and reconstructive surgery: protocol of a systematic review
    Mantelakis, Angelos
    Khajuria, Ankur
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [4] 223 The Clinical Applications of Machine Learning in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Mantelakis, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [5] The application of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: A systematic review
    Ruccia, Francesca
    Mavilakandy, Akash
    Imtiaz, Hassan
    Erskine, John
    Liew, Yong Yie
    Ali, Meyada
    Khajuria, Ankur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2024, 20 (04):
  • [6] The Value of Postconditioning in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Weng, Weidong
    Zhang, Feng
    Lineaweaver, William C.
    Gao, Weiyang
    Yan, Hede
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2016, 32 (04) : 285 - 293
  • [7] Psychology of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Clinical Review
    Shridharani, Sachin M.
    Magarakis, Michael
    Manson, Paul N.
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (06) : 2243 - 2251
  • [8] Psychology of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Clinical Review
    Sarwer, David B.
    Whitaker, Linton A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (03) : 827 - 828
  • [9] Effects of Nanofat in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Tran, Vinh Vuong The
    Jin, Xian
    Hong, Ki Yong
    Chang, Hak
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (03) : 451e - 464e
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Firriolo, Joseph M.
    Nuzzi, Laura C.
    Labow, Brian I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : S219 - S220