POST-MERGER & ACQUISITIONS (M&A) RETURNS: ARE BUYERS WINNERS? EVIDENCE FROM PORTUGAL

被引:0
|
作者
Ribeiro, Humberto Nuno Rito [1 ]
Carvalho, Preciosa da Conceicao Sampaio [1 ]
Pereira, Jose Manuel Teixeira
da Silva, Amelia Cristina Ferreira
机构
[1] Polytech Inst Braganca, Sch Technol & Management, Braganca, Portugal
关键词
Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A); Takeovers; Event Study; Supranormal Returns; Portugal; TAKEOVERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Companies operate in a highly competitive market at a globalized time. One of the strategies used by firms, which characterize this global integration of the markets, is called the Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A). These transactions are one of the biggest events that can occur in a companies' life which consequently produce impacts not only for the companies involved but also for the market structure. In fact, this phenomenon involves a set of controversies among academics who continue to debate, for example, whether these operations result in an increase of productivity or if they create rather than destroy value for the shareholders of the companies. Furthermore, despite a consensus on the popularity of Mergers and Acquisitions operations (e. g. Lubatkin, 1983 and Gaughan, 2007), there are many reasons for performing these operations, the most targeted to achieve a good investment, that is, a profitable businesses (Pautler, 2001). In fact, M&A is a strategy used by organizations in order to achieve their objectives of growth and diversification This paper aims to examine takeovers that have occurred in the last decade in Portugal using the event studies methodology. The results obtained suggest that the shareholders of the buying companies' usufruct narrow returns only, tending to close to zero. In global terms, the results suggest a positive impact for the involved shareholders in this type of transactions. Finally, it is important to note the potential presence of insider trading in these transactions.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1352
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coevolution of post-merger integration and dual knowledge networks reconstruction: evidence from Chinese overseas acquisitions
    Chen, Feiqiong
    Wang, Wenjing
    Zhu, Jieru
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2023, 17 (04) : 906 - 932
  • [2] THE SUN CUBE STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR M&A DEALS IN PMI (POST-MERGER MANAGEMENT)
    Martirosyan, Emil
    Vashakmadze, Teimuraz
    CONFRONTING CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS CHALLENGES THROUGH MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2013, : 1506 - 1515
  • [3] Managing Mergers and Acquisitions or Post-Merger Cookbook for CIOs and IT Management
    Albayrak, Can Adam
    Gadatsch, Andreas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2009, : 1 - +
  • [4] Bank mergers and acquisitions and the post-merger and acquisition performance of combined banks: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
    Ayagre, Philip
    Aboagye, Anthony Q. Q.
    Sarpong-Kumankoma, E.
    Asuming, Patrick Opoku
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [5] The impact of powerful CFOs in M&A: evidence from US acquisitions
    Lammers, Frederic
    Pape, Ulrich
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [6] Post-merger strategy and performance: evidence from the US and European banking industries
    Hagendorff, Jens
    Keasey, Kevin
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2009, 49 (04): : 725 - 751
  • [7] How do organizations refine their post-merger integration routines over consecutive acquisitions?
    Abravanel, Ika
    Biron, Michal
    Brueller, Nir N.
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [8] Acquisitions of Startups by Incumbents: The 3 Cs of Co-Specialization from Startup Inception to Post-Merger Integration
    Brueller, Nir N.
    Capron, Laurence
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 63 (03) : 70 - 93
  • [9] From the practice: Success factors of post-merger integration
    Kramer, Josef
    GRUPPENDYNAMIK UND ORGANISATIONSBERATUNG, 2006, 37 (01): : 79 - 84
  • [10] Integration duration of post-merger and leverage dynamics of mergers: theory and evidence
    Cheng, Yao
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 31 (02) : 208 - 231