DIVERSITY OF TEA ENDOPHYTIC FUNGI: CULTIVAR- AND TISSUE PREFERENCES

被引:24
|
作者
Win, P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Matsumura, E. [1 ,3 ]
Fukuda, K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Dept Nat Environm Studies, 5-1-5 Kashiwa No Ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778563, Japan
[2] Yezin Agr Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar
[3] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Agr & Life Sci, Dept Forest Sci, Bunkyo Ku, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Tokyo 1138657, Japan
来源
关键词
fungal community; healthy tissues; Japanese tea cultivars; leaf; stem; ACTIVITIES IN-VITRO; CAMELLIA-SINENSIS; HOST-RANGE; PHOMOPSIS; GROWTH; GLOEOSPORIOIDES; COMMUNITIES; LEAVES; RICE;
D O I
10.15666/aeer/1601_677695
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Endophytic fungi were isolated from four healthy tissues (new leaf, old leaf, bark, and xylem) of three Japanese tea cultivars (Hokumei, Sayamakaori, and Yabukita) at the Saitama Tea Research Institute, Japan in July 2015. A total of 520 isolates was obtained from 600 segments and were classified into 44 fungal taxa; the majority (93.2%) belonged to the phylum Ascomycota. The lowest infection rate was found in the xylem tissue of all cultivars. The total infection rate did not differ significantly among the cultivars. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. camelliae and Pleosporales sp. were the predominant endophytes in all tissue types and cultivars. Most of the dominant endophytes showed obvious cultivar and tissue preferences. Tissue type played a more important role in shaping community structure than did cultivar. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. camelliae preferred bark and old leaf tissue while Pleosporales sp. preferred new leaf tissue. The colonization frequency of C. gloeosporioides f. sp. camelliae was significantly lower in the Yabukita cultivar. Stem tissues harbored more diverse endophytes than did leaf tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 695
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Pesticides on the Diversity of Endophytic Fungi in Tea Plants
    Phyu Mar Win
    Emi Matsumura
    Kenji Fukuda
    Microbial Ecology, 2021, 82 : 62 - 72
  • [2] Effects of Pesticides on the Diversity of Endophytic Fungi in Tea Plants
    Win, Phyu Mar
    Matsumura, Emi
    Fukuda, Kenji
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 82 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [3] Diversity and Advantages of Culturable Endophytic Fungi from Tea (Camellia sinensis)
    Onlamun, Thanyarat
    Boonthavee, Autchima
    Brooks, Siraprapa
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [4] Diversity of endophytic fungi in Glycine max
    Fernandes, Elio Gomes
    Pereira, Olinto Liparini
    da Silva, Cynthia Canedo
    Pereira Bento, Claudia Braga
    de Queiroz, Marisa Vieira
    MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 181 : 84 - 92
  • [5] Distribution pattern of endophytic bacteria and fungi in tea plants
    Lin, Haiyan
    Liu, Changwei
    Peng, Zhong
    Tan, Bin
    Wang, Kunbo
    Liu, Zhonghua
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] The diversity of endophytic fungi in the above-ground tissue of two Lycopodium species in Poland
    Julia Pawłowska
    Mateusz Wilk
    Anna Śliwińska-Wyrzychowska
    Monika Mętrak
    Marta Wrzosek
    Symbiosis, 2014, 63 : 87 - 97
  • [7] The diversity of endophytic fungi in the above-ground tissue of two Lycopodium species in Poland
    Pawlowska, Julia
    Wilk, Mateusz
    Sliwinska-Wyrzychowska, Anna
    Metrak, Monika
    Wrzosek, Marta
    SYMBIOSIS, 2014, 63 (02) : 87 - 97
  • [8] Diversity, distribution and biotechnological potential of endophytic fungi
    You-Kun Zheng
    Xin-Guo Qiao
    Cui-Ping Miao
    Kai Liu
    You-Wei Chen
    Li-Hua Xu
    Li-Xing Zhao
    Annals of Microbiology, 2016, 66 : 529 - 542
  • [9] Hidden diversity of endophytic fungi in an invasive plant
    Shipunov, Alexey
    Newcombe, George
    Raghavendra, Anil K. H.
    Anderson, Cort L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2008, 95 (09) : 1096 - 1108
  • [10] Diversity, distribution and biotechnological potential of endophytic fungi
    Zheng, You-Kun
    Qiao, Xin-Guo
    Miao, Cui-Ping
    Liu, Kai
    Chen, You-Wei
    Xu, Li-Hua
    Zhao, Li-Xing
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 66 (02) : 529 - 542