Evaluating work readiness following acquired brain injury: Building a shared understanding

被引:19
|
作者
Stergiou-Kita, Mary [1 ]
Rappolt, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Kirsh, Bonnie [1 ,2 ]
Shaw, Lynn [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Grad Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Occupat Therapy, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
关键词
Rehabilitation; vocational; Work capacity evaluation; Occupational therapy assessment; Brain injuries; Qualitative studies; RETURN; EMPLOYMENT; STABILITY; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/000841740907600406
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background. Despite occupational therapists' role in work-related evaluations, there are no guidelines for evaluating clients' work readiness. Purpose. This study explored how occupational therapists evaluate work readiness following acquired brain injury in order to develop an integrated model of the factors, processes, stakeholders, and contextual elements relevant to this evaluation. Methods. Ten occupational therapists with expertise in vocational and brain injury rehabilitation were interviewed. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods to develop the work readiness evaluation model. Findings. This model describes five processes formative to therapists' evaluation: (1) drawing upon diverse sources of information and perspectives; (2) assessing occupational capacity; (3) contextualizing occupational potential; (4) building a shared understanding of work readiness among stakeholders, including, clients, employers, insurers, and rehabilitation teams; and (5) transforming the work readiness question. Implications. The model highlights the importance of building a shared understanding amongst stakeholders and provides a provisional framework to guide practice.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: Occupational therapists' perceptions
    Stergiou-Kita, Mary
    Yantzi, Amber
    Wan, Jeffrey
    BRAIN INJURY, 2010, 24 (7-8) : 948 - 958
  • [2] Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers
    Donker-Cools, Birgit H. P. M.
    Schouten, Maria J. E.
    Wind, Haije
    Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [3] Understanding Acquired Brain Injury: A Review
    Goldman, Liam
    Siddiqui, Ehraz Mehmood
    Khan, Andleeb
    Jahan, Sadaf
    Rehman, Muneeb U.
    Mehan, Sidharth
    Sharma, Rajat
    Budkin, Stepan
    Kumar, Shashi Nandar
    Sahu, Ankita
    Kumar, Manish
    Vaibhav, Kumar
    BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [4] Understanding, evaluating, and managing attention disorders following traumatic brain injury
    Mateer, CA
    Mapou, RL
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1996, 11 (02) : 1 - 16
  • [5] Acquired brain injury and work participation
    Vernooy F.
    TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde, 2020, 28 (5): : 24 - 28
  • [6] Returning to work after acquired brain injury: Perspectives of acquired brain injury survivors
    Earley, Caroline
    BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (5-6) : 648 - 648
  • [7] Consumer perspectives of vocational rehabilitation and return to work following acquired brain injury
    Watter, Kerrin
    Kennedy, Areti
    McLennan, Vanette
    Vogler, Jessica
    Jeffery, Sarah
    Murray, Alena
    Ehlers, Shelley
    Nielsen, Mandy
    BRAIN IMPAIRMENT, 2022, 23 (02) : 164 - 184
  • [8] Acquired Brain Injury Following Sepsis*
    Hopkins, Ramona O.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (11) : 1658 - 1659
  • [9] The meaning of work after acquired brain injury
    Johansson, U.
    Tham, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 16 : 192 - 192
  • [10] The meaning of work after acquired brain injury
    Johansson, U
    Tham, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2006, 60 (01): : 60 - 69