Evaluation of Cloud Microphysics in JMA-NHM Simulations Using Bin or Bulk Microphysical Schemes through Comparison with Cloud Radar Observations

被引:16
|
作者
Iguchi, Takamichi [1 ,2 ]
Nakajima, Teruyuki [3 ]
Khain, Alexander P. [4 ]
Sait, Kazuo [5 ]
Takemura, Toshihiko [6 ]
Okamoto, Hajime [6 ]
Nishizawa, Tomoaki [7 ]
Tao, Wei-Kuo [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Atmospheres Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Tokyo, Atmosphere & Ocean Res Inst, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Inst Life Sci, Dept Atmospher Sci, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
[5] Meteorol Res Inst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[6] Kyushu Univ, Appl Mech Res Inst, Fukuoka 8168580, Japan
[7] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PROFILING RADAR; MODEL; ICE; SATELLITE; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1175/JAS-D-11-0213.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) simulations using the Japan Meteorological Agency Nonhydrostatic Model (JMA-NHM) are conducted for three precipitation events observed by shipborne or spaceborne W-band cloud radars. Spectral bin and single-moment bulk cloud microphysics schemes are employed separately for an intercomparative study. A radar product simulator that is compatible with both microphysics schemes is developed to enable a direct comparison between simulation and observation with respect to the equivalent radar reflectivity factor Ze, Doppler velocity (DV), and path-integrated attenuation (PIA). In general, the bin model simulation shows better agreement with the observed data than the bulk model simulation. The correction of the terminal fall velocities of snowflakes using those of hail further improves the result of the bin model simulation. The results indicate that there are substantial uncertainties in the mass-size and size-terminal fall velocity relations of snowflakes or in the calculation of terminal fall velocity of snow aloft. For the bulk microphysics, the overestimation of Ze is observed as a result of a significant predominance of snow over cloud ice due to substantial deposition growth directly to snow. The DV comparison shows that a correction for the fall velocity of hydrometeors considering a change of particle size should be introduced even in single-moment bulk cloud microphysics.
引用
收藏
页码:2566 / 2586
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of WRF Cloud Microphysics Schemes Using Radar Observations
    Min, Ki-Hong
    Choo, Sunhee
    Lee, Daehyung
    Lee, Gyuwon
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2015, 30 (06) : 1571 - 1589
  • [2] Evaluation of Rain Microphysics Using a Radar Simulator and Numerical Models: Comparison of Two-Moment Bulk and Spectral Bin Cloud Microphysics Schemes
    Kuba, Naomi
    Seiki, Tatsuya
    Suzuki, Kentaroh
    Roh, Woosub
    Satoh, Masaki
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [3] Evaluation of cloud microphysics schemes in simulations of a winter storm using radar and radiometer measurements
    Han, Mei
    Braun, Scott A.
    Matsui, Toshihisa
    Williams, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (03) : 1401 - 1419
  • [4] Sensitivity of a Cloud-Resolving Model to Bulk and Explicit Bin Microphysical Schemes. Part II: Cloud Microphysics and Storm Dynamics Interactions
    Li, Xiaowen
    Tao, Wei-Kuo
    Khain, Alexander P.
    Simpson, Joanne
    Johnson, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2009, 66 (01) : 22 - 40
  • [5] A Comparative Study of Bin and Bulk Cloud Microphysics Schemes in Simulating a Heavy Precipitation Case
    Lee, Hyunho
    Baik, Jong-Jin
    ATMOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (12):
  • [6] Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization
    Khain, A. P.
    Beheng, K. D.
    Heymsfield, A.
    Korolev, A.
    Krichak, S. O.
    Levin, Z.
    Pinsky, M.
    Phillips, V.
    Prabhakaran, T.
    Teller, A.
    van den Heever, S. C.
    Yano, J. -I.
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 53 (02) : 247 - 322
  • [7] An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of a Convection Cloud Chamber Using Haze-Capable Bin and Lagrangian Cloud Microphysics Schemes
    Yang, Fan
    Hoffmann, Fabian
    Shaw, Raymond A.
    Ovchinnikov, Mikhail
    Vogelmann, Andrew M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [8] Comparisons of bin and bulk microphysics schemes in simulations of topographic winter precipitation with radar and radiometer measurements
    Han, Mei
    Braun, Scott A.
    Matsui, Toshihisa
    Iguchi, Takamichi
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 144 (715) : 1926 - 1946
  • [9] Numerical simulation of precipitation formation in the case orographically induced convective cloud: Comparison of the results of bin and bulk microphysical schemes
    Sarkadi, N.
    Geresdi, I.
    Thompson, G.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 180 : 241 - 261
  • [10] A study of cloud microphysics and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau by radar observations and cloud-resolving model simulations
    Gao, Wenhua
    Sui, Chung-Hsiung
    Fan, Jiwen
    Hu, Zhiqun
    Zhong, Lingzhi
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (22) : 13735 - 13752