Peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery versus open radical hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Hoegl, Jorge [1 ]
Viveros-Carreno, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palacios, Tatiana [5 ]
Gallego-Ardila, Andres [6 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [7 ]
Estrada, Erick Estuardo [8 ]
Noll, Florencia [9 ]
Krause, Kate [10 ]
Baiocchi, Glauco [11 ]
Minig, Lucas [12 ]
Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando [13 ,14 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Este Dr Domingo Luciani, Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Caracas, Venezuela
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Clin Univ Colombia, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Ctr Tratamiento Invest Canc Luis Carlos Sarmiento, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Hosp Infantil Univ San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Vicerrectoria Invest, Bogota, Colombia
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[8] Hosp Gen San Juan Dios, Gynecol & Obstet, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Hosp Sanat Allende, Ginecol Oncol, Cordoba, Argentina
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[11] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[12] Valencian Inst Oncol IVO, Gynecol Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[13] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Bogota, Colombia
[14] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Grp Invest Clin & Epidemiol Canc, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
cervical cancer; adenocarcinoma; peritoneum; laparoscopes; laparotomy; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PATTERNS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003937
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. MethodsThe MEDLINE (accessed through Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinical Trials, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from inception up to April 2022. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies reported on patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA-IIA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and/or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent primary surgery. Studies had to report at least one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a recurrence pattern, and only studies comparing recurrence after minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery were considered. Variables of interest were manually extracted into a standardized electronic database. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325068). ResultsThe initial search identified 518 articles. After the removal of the duplicate entries from the initial search, two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the remaining 453 articles. Finally, 78 articles were selected for full-text evaluation; 22 articles (a total of 7626 patients) were included in the analysis-one randomized controlled trial and 21 observational retrospective studies. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 60.9%, and the tumor size was <4 cm in 92.8% of patients. Peritoneal carcinomatosis pattern represented 22.2% of recurrences in the minimally invasive surgery approach versus 8.8% in open surgery, accounting for 15.5% of all recurrences. The meta-analysis of observational studies revealed a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, p<0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery is associated with a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Smith, Anna Jo Bodurtha
    Jones, Tiffany Nicole
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 544 - U60
  • [2] Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones, Tiffany
    Smith, Anna Jo
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S206 - S207
  • [3] Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hinojosa-Gonzalez, David Eugenio
    Roblesgil-Medrano, Andres
    Villarreal-Espinosa, Juan Bernardo
    Tellez-Garcia, Eduardo
    Bueno-Gutierrez, Luis Carlos
    Rodriguez-Barreda, Jose Ramon
    Flores-Villalba, Eduardo
    Martinez, Hector R.
    Benvenutti-Regato, Mario
    Figueroa-Sanchez, Jose Antonio
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04) : 583 - 597
  • [4] Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Hongbin
    Li, Jiangsong
    Li, Kui
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Zhu, Zaisheng
    Tian, Daxue
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (10) : 4604 - 4618
  • [5] Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michał Pędziwiatr
    Piotr Małczak
    Magdalena Pisarska
    Piotr Major
    Michał Wysocki
    Tomasz Stefura
    Andrzej Budzyński
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 841 - 851
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Surgery Spinal Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lu, Victor M.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Gilder, Hannah E.
    McCutcheon, Brandon A.
    Phan, Kevin
    Bydon, Mohamad
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (03) : E177 - E185
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Neradi, Deepak
    Kumar, Vishal
    Kumar, Sunil
    Sodavarapu, Praveen
    Goni, Vijay
    Dhatt, Sarvdeep Singh
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (02) : 279 - 289
  • [8] Minimally invasive versus open surgery for degenerative lumbar pathologies:a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gabriel Pokorny
    Rodrigo Amaral
    Fernando Marcelino
    Rafael Moriguchi
    Igor Barreira
    Marcelo Yozo
    Luiz Pimenta
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2502 - 2526
  • [9] Minimally invasive versus open surgery for degenerative lumbar pathologies:a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pokorny, Gabriel
    Amaral, Rodrigo
    Marcelino, Fernando
    Moriguchi, Rafael
    Barreira, Igor
    Yozo, Marcelo
    Pimenta, Luiz
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (10) : 2502 - 2526
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Open Mitral Valve Surgery A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Cheng, Davy C. H.
    Martin, Janet
    Lal, Avtar
    Diegeler, Anno
    Folliguet, Thierry A.
    Nifong, L. Wiley
    Perier, Patrick
    Raanani, Ehud
    Smith, J. Michael
    Seeburger, Joerg
    Falk, Volkmar
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 6 (02) : 84 - 103