Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care

被引:36
|
作者
Sorhaindo, Annik Mahalia [1 ,2 ]
Lavelanet, Antonella Francheska [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, 20 Ave Appia, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] WHO, World Bank Special Programme Res, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP, UNDP,UNFPA,UNICEF, 20 Ave Appia, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Abortion stigma; Qualitative research; Treatment; Thematic analysis; Measurement; Indicators; Quality in abortion care; UNSAFE ABORTION; HEALTH-CARE; WOMENS ACCESS; UNWANTED PREGNANCY; POSTABORTION CARE; SAFE ABORTION; YOUNG-WOMEN; OF-CARE; EXPERIENCES; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115271
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Abortion stigma shapes the environment in which abortion is delivered and received and can have important implications for quality in abortion care. However, this has not previously been clearly articulated and evi-denced. We conducted a scoping review of existing qualitative evidence to characterize the relationship between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care. Using a systematic process, we located 50 qualitative studies to include in our analysis.We applied the interface of the WHO quality of care and abortion stigma frameworks to the qualitative evi-dence to capture manifestations of the interaction between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care in the existing literature. Four overarching themes linked to abortion stigma emerged: A) abortion as a sin and other religious views; B) regulation of abortion; C) judgement, labelling and marking; and D) shame, denial, and se-crecy. We further characterized the emerging ways in which abortion stigma operates to inhibit quality in abortion care into seven manifestations of the relationship between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care: 1) poor treatment and the repercussions, 2) gatekeeping and obstruction of access, 3) avoiding disclosure, 4) arduous and unnecessary requirements, 5) poor infrastructure and lack of resources, 6) punishment and threats and 7) lack of a designated place for abortion services.This evidence complements the abortion stigma-adapted WHO quality of care framework suggested by the International Network for the Reduction of Abortion Discrimination and Stigma (inroads) by illustrating spe-cifically how the postulated stigma-related barriers to quality abortion care occur in practice. Further research should assess these manifestations in the quantitative literature and contribute to the development of quality in abortion care indicators that include measures of abortion stigma, and the development of abortion stigma reduction interventions to improve quality in abortion care.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The economics of abortion and its links with stigma: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on the economics of abortion
    Moore, Brittany
    Poss, Cheri
    Coast, Ernestina
    Lattof, Samantha R.
    Rodgers, Yana van der Meulen
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [2] Understanding the role of race in abortion stigma in the United States: a systematic scoping review
    Brown, Katherine
    Laverde, Ruth
    Barr-Walker, Jill
    Steinauer, Jody
    SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [3] Interventions to reduce stigma related to contraception and abortion: a scoping review
    Sorhaindo, Annik
    Loi, Ulrika Rehnstrom
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [4] Qualitative Evidence on Abortion Stigma from Mexico City and Five States in Mexico
    Sorhaindo, Annik M.
    Juarez-Ramirez, Clara
    Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia
    Aldaz, Evelyn
    Mejia Pineros, Maria Consuelo
    Garcia, Sandra
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2014, 54 (07) : 622 - 640
  • [5] ROLE OF SERVICE-DELIVERY ORGANIZATIONS IN REDUCING ABORTION STIGMA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Baum, S.
    Herold, S.
    Grossman, D.
    Blanchard, K.
    Upadhyay, U.
    Cockrill, K.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (03) : 298 - 298
  • [6] Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care
    Shelly Makleff
    Madeleine Belfrage
    Sethini Wickramasinghe
    Jane Fisher
    Deborah Bateson
    Kirsten I. Black
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [7] The microeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic consequences for abortion care-seekers
    Coast, Ernestina
    Lattof, Samantha R.
    Meulen Rodgers, Yana van der
    Moore, Brittany
    Poss, Cheri
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [8] Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care
    Makleff, Shelly
    Belfrage, Madeleine
    Wickramasinghe, Sethini
    Fisher, Jane
    Bateson, Deborah
    Black, Kirsten I.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [9] The role of nurses and midwives in the provision of abortion care: A scoping review
    Mainey, Lydia
    O'Mullan, Catherine
    Reid-Searl, Kerry
    Taylor, Annabel
    Baird, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (9-10) : 1513 - 1526
  • [10] A scoping review of the role of HIV-related stigma and discrimination in noncommunicable disease care
    Stockton, Melissa A.
    Giger, Kayla
    Nyblade, Laura
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):