Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Velayati, Ashraf [1 ]
Hosseini, Seyed Alireza [2 ]
Sari, Ali Akbari [3 ]
Mohtasham, Farideh [4 ]
Ghanei, Mostafa [5 ]
Yaghoubi, Mohsen [6 ]
Majdzadeh, Reza [7 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med Educ, Dept Educ Management Econ & Policy, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Food & Drug Res Ctr, Food & Drug Org, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Knowledge Utilizat Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Chem Injuries Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Clin Knowledge Management Unit, Dept Community Med, Tehran, Iran
[7] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Asthma; formoterol; salmeterol; INHALED FORMOTEROL; OPEN-LABEL; SALBUTAMOL; BRONCHOCONSTRICTION; SUBSENSITIVITY; RESPONSIVENESS; MULTICENTER; MODERATE; DYSPNEA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Formoterol and salmeterol are two long-acting beta 2-agonists given by inhalation, with bronchodilating effects lasting for at least 12 h after a single administration. Formoterol has a faster onset of action compared with salmeterol. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the data published from previous review in order to calculate pooled estimates of effectiveness and safety assessment of formoterol and salmeterol in treatment of patients with asthma. Materials and Methods: In this study, we conducted an electronic search for medical citation databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and IranMedex. Besides manual search of the databases that record randomized clinical trials, conference proceedings, and journals related to asthma were included. Studies were evaluated by two independent people based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the common outcomes of studies were entered into the RevMan 5.0.1 software, after evaluation of studies and extraction of data from them; and in cases where there were homogeneous studies, meta-analysis was performed, and for heterogeneous studies, the results were reported qualitatively. Results: Of the 1539 studies initially found, 13 were included in the study. According to the meta-analysis conducted, no significant difference was found between the inhalation of formoterol 12 mu g and salmeterol 50 mu g in the two outcomes of mean forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1), 12 h after inhalation of medication and Borg score (A frequently used scale for quantifying breathlessness) after inhalation of medication. In addition, salmeterol was more effective than formoterol in the two outcomes of percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of methacholine and the number of days without an attack. Since the two outcomes of FEV1 30-60 min after inhalation of medication and morning peak expiratory flow after inhalation of medication were heterogeneous, they had no meta-analysis capabilities, and its results were reported qualitatively. Conclusion: The data from included studies shows that, more efficacy has been achieved with Salmeterol, especially in some outcomes such as the percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of Methacholine, and the number of days without an attack; and therefore, the administration of Salmeterol seems to be beneficial for patients, compared with Formoterol.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma
    Rutten-van Mölken, MPMH
    van Doorslaer, EKA
    Till, MD
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 14 (06) : 671 - 684
  • [2] Budesonide/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone for asthma in children: an effectiveness and safety analysis
    Jiang, Ping
    Zhao, Lanyu
    Yao, Zezhong
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (17) : 1283 - 1289
  • [3] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Formoterol Versus Salmeterol in Patients with Asthma
    Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Mölken
    Eddy K. A. van Doorslaer
    M. Denise Till
    PharmacoEconomics, 1998, 14 : 671 - 684
  • [4] The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in treating pediatric asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guan, Renzheng
    Liu, Yanli
    Ren, Dunqiang
    Li, Jinfeng
    Xu, Tao
    Hu, Haiyan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019,
  • [5] Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine versus placebo in patients with myotonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elettreby, Abdelrahman Mohammed
    Elnaga, Ahmed Abdullah Abo
    Alsaied, Mohamed Ahmed
    Ewis, Dalia Kamal
    Sharkawy, Aya Mohammed
    Fareed, Rahma
    Alderbi, Gehad Magdy
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 45 (08) : 3989 - 4001
  • [6] Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of cupping therapy in the treatment of asthma A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Lei
    Wang, Lie
    Wang, Zhongtian
    Wei, Lina
    Ding, Lizhong
    Kong, Yibu
    Liu, Zhimei
    Tian, Ye
    Yang, Fushuang
    Sun, Liping
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (41) : E27518
  • [7] Formoterol for acute asthma in the emergency department: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Rodrigo, Gustavo J.
    Neffen, Hugo
    Colodenco, Federico D.
    Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 104 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [8] SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLUENZA VACCINES IN PEOPLE WITH ASTHMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Vasileiou, E.
    Sheikh, A.
    Butler, C.
    El Ferkh, K.
    Simpson, C. R.
    THORAX, 2016, 71 : A155 - A155
  • [9] The effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab versus cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Yuying
    Guo, Yingxue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (04) : 843 - 851
  • [10] The effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab versus cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuying Cui
    Yingxue Guo
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 843 - 851