Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary?

被引:5
|
作者
Anastay, Vassili [1 ]
Gondran-Tellier, Bastien [1 ]
McManus, Robin [1 ]
Delonca, Raphaelle [1 ]
Akiki, Akram [1 ]
Gaillet, Sarah [1 ]
Delaporte, Veronique [1 ]
Andre, Marc [2 ]
Daniel, Laurent [3 ]
Karsenty, Gilles [1 ]
Lechevallier, Eric [1 ]
Boissier, Romain [1 ]
Baboudjian, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Concept Acad Hosp, APHM, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Concept Acad Hosp, APHM, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, Marseille, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, Concept Acad Hosp, APHM, Dept Pathol Anat & Cytol, Marseille, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI; Biopsy; Prostate-specific antigen; INTERVENING BENIGN TISSUE; DISCONTINUOUS FOCI; CANCER DETECTION; RISK CALCULATOR; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-020-02728-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), alone or combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen density (PSAd) to exclude clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all the patients who had transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB) in our center between January 2014 and March 2019. We included patients who had nonsuspicious prebiopsy mpMRI defined as Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) <= 2. MRI was performed using a 1.5 or 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance scanners with external phased-array coil. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa, defined as a Gleason score 3 + 4 (ISUP 2) or higher on at least one biopsy core. Results One hundred and ninety-one consecutive men (median age: 65 years, median PSA level: 9.3 ng/mL) underwent TRUSGB following negative prebiopsy mpMRI corresponding to 126 (66%) biopsy-naive patients, 36 (18.8%) patients with prior negative biopsy, and 29 (15.2%) patients under active surveillance with confirmatory biopsies. The overall PCa and csPCA detection rates were 26.7% and 5.2%, conferring a NPV of 73.3% and 94.8%, respectively. The NPV of negative mpMRI improved to 95.8% in patients with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL/cm(3)and to 100% in patients with PSAd < 0.10 ng/mL/cm(3). Conclusions A negative prebiopsy mpMRI had an overall NPV of 94.8% for csPCa when mpMRI was used alone to 95.8% when combined with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL/cm(3). Future studies are needed to balance the low benefit of a biopsy in this indication with the morbidity of the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:4160 / 4165
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary?
    Vassili Anastay
    Bastien Gondran-Tellier
    Robin McManus
    Raphaelle Delonca
    Akram Akiki
    Sarah Gaillet
    Veronique Delaporte
    Marc Andre
    Laurent Daniel
    Gilles Karsenty
    Eric Lechevallier
    Romain Boissier
    Michael Baboudjian
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4160 - 4165
  • [2] IS CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY STILL NECESSARY IN MEN WITH GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER IN THE MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI ERA?
    Bhanji, Yasin
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Fletcher, Sean
    Landis, Patricia
    Macura, Katarzyna
    Pavlovich, Christian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E287 - E287
  • [3] Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI of the prostate: The end of randomized biopsies?
    Belas, O.
    Klap, J.
    Cornud, F.
    Beuvon, F.
    Peyromaure, M.
    Zerbib, M.
    Delongchamps, N. B.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2012, 22 (10): : 583 - 589
  • [4] Is it necessary to biopsy indeterminate lesions on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) scan of prostate?
    Thandapani, K.
    Chau, T. W.
    Hui, W. Q.
    Lincoln, T.
    Chiong, E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 34 - 34
  • [5] IS PROSTATE BIOPSY STILL NECESSARY?
    Di Silverio, Franco
    Salciccia, Stefano
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Lisi, Danilo
    Alfarone, Andrea
    Parente, Ulderico
    Gentilucci, Alessandro
    Cattarino, Susanna
    Innocenzi, Michele
    Passariello, Roberto
    Gentile, Vincenzo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1929 - 1930
  • [6] Is prostate biopsy still necessary?
    Di Silverio, F.
    Salciccia, S.
    Busetto, G. M.
    Panebianco, V
    Lisi, D.
    Alfarone, A.
    Parente, U.
    Gentilucci, A.
    Cattarino, S.
    Innocenzi, M.
    Giovannone, R.
    Sciarra, A.
    Passariello, R.
    Gentile, V
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E261 - U692
  • [7] Is Confirmatory Biopsy Still Necessary for Active Surveillance of Men With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric MRI?
    Bhanji, Yasin
    Mamawala, Mufaddal K.
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Landis, Patricia
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 213 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [8] Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Fenstermaker, Michael
    Huang, Richard
    Wysock, James S.
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Marshall, Susan
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Zhou, Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Taneja, Samir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 512 - 517
  • [9] Prebiopsy Multiparametric 3T Prostate MRI in Patients With Elevated PSA, Normal Digital Rectal Examination, and No Previous Biopsy
    Jambor, Ivan
    Kahkonen, Esa
    Taimen, Pekka
    Merisaari, Harri
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Alanen, Kalle
    Obsitnik, Branislav
    Minn, Heikki
    Lehotska, Viera
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (05) : 1394 - 1404
  • [10] Are systematic prostate biopsy still necessary in biopsy naive men?
    Chau, Matthew
    Barns, Mitchell
    Barratt, Owain
    McDermott, Kara
    Kuan, Melvyn
    Teloken, Patrick
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (04) : 1729 - 1734