Evidence-Based Practice for Rehabilitation Professionals: Concepts and Controversies

被引:74
|
作者
Dijkers, Marcel P. [1 ]
Murphy, Susan L. [2 ,3 ]
Krellman, Jason [4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Hlth Care Syst, GRECC, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] NYU, Rusk Inst Rehabil Med, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
Allied health occupations; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice; Practice guidelines as topic; Professional practice; Rehabilitation; Review literature as topic; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; EVIDENCE STANDARDS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; META-SYNTHESIS; BRAIN-INJURY; OPEN ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This article describes evidence-based practice (EBP) in the health professions and sciences in general and in the rehabilitation disciplines specifically. It discusses the following: what counts as evidence and how that has changed over the last 4 decades, trends in the short history of evidence-based medicine and EBP, the fallacious nature of most criticisms of EBP, (perceived) shortcomings of clinical research and the resulting evidence in rehabilitation, resources available to clinicians who want their practice to be evidence-based, and the barriers these clinicians face in keeping up with the evidence and applying it in practice. Lastly, it describes how the development of a new art and science, knowledge translation, may play a role in truly making EBP feasible in rehabilitation services.
引用
收藏
页码:S164 / S176
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条