Clamshell excavation of a permeable reactive barrier

被引:38
|
作者
Di Molfetta, A [1 ]
Sethi, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Torino, DITAG, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY | 2006年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
permeable reactive barrier (PRB); clamshell; zerovalent iron (ZVI); biopolymer slurry; guar gum;
D O I
10.1007/s00254-006-0215-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, permeable reactive barriers (PRB) are one of the most widespread techniques for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. Over the past 10 years, the use of iron-based PRBs has evolved from innovative to accepted standard practice for the treatment of a variety of groundwater contaminants (ITRC in: Permeable reactive barriers: lessons learned/new directions. The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team 2005). Although, a variety of excavation methods have been developed, backhoe excavators are often used for the construction of PRBs. The aim of this study is to describe the emplacement of a full-scale PRB and the benefits deriving from the use of a crawler crane equipped with a hydraulic grab (also known as clamshell excavator) in the excavation phases. The studied PRB was designed to remediate a chlorinated hydrocarbons plume at an old industrial landfill site, in Avigliana, near the city of Torino, in Italy. The continuous reactive barrier was designed to be 120 m long, 13 m deep, and 0.6 m thick. The installation of the barrier was accomplished using a clamshell for the excavation of the trench and a guar-gum slurry to support the walls. The performance of this technique was outstanding and allowed the installation of the PRB in 7 days. The degree of precision of the excavation was very high because of the intrinsic characteristics of this excavation tool and of the use of a concrete curb to guide the hydraulic grab. Moreover, the adopted technique permitted a saving of bioslurry thus minimizing the amount of biocide required.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 369
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Permeable reactive barrier costs compiled
    不详
    HAZARDOUS WASTE CONSULTANT, 2003, 21 (01) : A7 - A9
  • [2] Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation
    Thiruverikatachari, R.
    Vigneswaran, S.
    Naidu, R.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2008, 14 (02) : 145 - 156
  • [3] ENSURING PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER EFFICACY AND LONGEVITY
    Suponik, Tomasz
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2010, 36 (03): : 59 - 73
  • [4] Permeable reactive barrier rejuvenation by alkaline wastewater
    Banasiak, Laura Joan
    Pathirage, Udeshini
    Indraratna, Buddhima
    McIntosh, Geoff
    Lugg, Glenys
    Rendell, Neil
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS, 2015, 2 (01): : 45 - 55
  • [5] Development of Permeable Reactive Barrier for Phosphorus Removal
    Oliveira, M.
    Machado, A. V.
    Nogueira, R.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS FORUM V, PT 1 AND 2, 2010, 636-637 : 1365 - +
  • [6] An Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Projects in California
    Muegge, John
    Hadley, Paul
    REMEDIATION-THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP COSTS TECHNOLOGIES & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 20 (01): : 41 - 57
  • [7] The diffusion-active permeable reactive barrier
    Schwarz, Alex O.
    Rittmann, Bruce E.
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2010, 112 (1-4) : 155 - 162
  • [8] A permeable reactive barrier for treatment of heavy metals
    Ludwig, RD
    McGregor, RG
    Blowes, DW
    Benner, SG
    Mountjoy, K
    GROUND WATER, 2002, 40 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [9] Phosphorus reactive materials for permeable reactive barrier filling - lifespan estimations
    Bus, Agnieszka
    Karczmarczyka, Agnieszka
    Baryla, Anna
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2022, 245 : 9 - 15
  • [10] Early breakthrough of molybdenum and uranium in a permeable reactive barrier
    Morrison, SJ
    Mushovic, PS
    Niesen, PL
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (06) : 2018 - 2024