Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning

被引:4
|
作者
Wyatt, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
McCallum, Hazel M. [1 ,2 ]
Maxwell, Ross J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Northern Ctr Canc Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Positron Emission Tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; PET-MR; Quality Assurance; QA; Radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; MRI; REPEATABILITY; SENSITIVITY; PET/CT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods: QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electrome-chanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in-house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results: The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were <= 0.7 mm. The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were <= 3% for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was 0.3%. The stability SDs agreed within 0.6 mm, 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions: QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning
    Wyatt, J.
    Howell, E.
    McCallum, H.
    Maxwell, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S321 - S323
  • [2] Interest of positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning and control
    Crehange, G.
    Soussan, M.
    Gensanne, D.
    Decazes, P.
    Thariat, J.
    Thureau, S.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2020, 24 (05): : 398 - 402
  • [3] Quantitative simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Ouyang, Jinsong
    Petibon, Yoann
    Huang, Chuan
    Reese, Timothy G.
    Kolnick, Aleksandra L.
    El Fakhri, Georges
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 1 (03)
  • [4] Simultaneous in vivo positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Catana, Ciprian
    Procissi, Daniel
    Wu, Yibao
    Judenhofer, Martin S.
    Qi, Jinyi
    Pichler, Bernd J.
    Jacobs, Russell E.
    Cherry, Simon R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (10) : 3705 - 3710
  • [5] Visualization with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
    Seemann, MD
    Gaa, J
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (21) : E329 - E330
  • [6] Synthesis of Realistic Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data
    Polycarpou, Irene
    Soultanidis, Georgios
    Tsoumpas, Charalampos
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 37 (03) : 703 - 711
  • [7] Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
    Moghanaki, Drew
    Turkbey, Baris
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Frank, Steven J.
    McLaughlin, Patrick W.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 27 (01) : 21 - 33
  • [8] Multi-modality imaging (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography) for radiotherapy planning of pharyngo-laryngeal tumors
    Daisne, JF
    Duprez, T
    Weynand, B
    Lonneux, M
    Hamoir, M
    Reychler, H
    Grégoire, V
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S192 - S192
  • [9] Multiparametric assessment of myocarditis using simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
    Nensa, Felix
    Poeppel, Thorsten D.
    Krings, Peter
    Schlosser, Thomas
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (32) : 2173 - 2173
  • [10] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast
    Sher, Andrew
    Vercher-Conejero, Jose L.
    Muzic, Raymond F., Jr.
    Avril, Norbert
    Plecha, Donna
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 49 (04) : 304 - 312