Revisiting the Compression Parallel to Grain Design Values of Douglas-Fir

被引:1
|
作者
Miyamoto, Byrne T. [1 ]
Cheung, Kevin [2 ]
Clauson, Milo [1 ]
Sinha, Arijit [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Wood Sci & Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Western Wood Prod Assoc, Portland, OR USA
关键词
BENDING STRENGTH; MILL VARIATION; LOBLOLLY-PINE; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00085
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
After the decrease in southern pine (Pinus spp.) design values, concerns were raised over the design values of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), the most important structural species in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Moreover, species need to be re-evaluated every 5 years for properties by the grading agencies. Variability within Douglas-fir lumber may have increased over time because of changes in the silvicultural practices and management techniques including the shift from government to private plantation. The compression parallel to the grain design values took the greatest hit for southern pine. To assess if there is any decrease in the compressional design values, No. 2 grade Douglas-fir, of dimensions 38 by 89 by 2,438 mm, were attained from 36 different locations and were cut into 229-mm sections with 20 samples from each location. A total of 720 samples were tested to failure in compression parallel to grain according to ASTM International D4761. Additionally, 288 clear specimens were also tested. The compression strength was calculated and was compared among locations. The data were pooled to calculate the design values for compression parallel to the grain and compared with listed values in the National Design Specification. Variation of compressive strength within locations was observed, but even after accounting for the variation the calculated values are above the average reported value for clear wood specimens and higher than the code-recommended design value for nonclear specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 137
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPRESSION PERPENDICULAR TO THE GRAIN IN DRY DOUGLAS-FIR AND HEM-FIR
    JOHNSON, JW
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1983, 33 (03) : 55 - 63
  • [2] Douglas fir or Douglas-fir?
    Anon
    New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 2002, 47 (01):
  • [3] COMPRESSION ROLLING OF SITKA SPRUCE AND DOUGLAS-FIR
    GUNZERODT, H
    WALKER, JCF
    WHYBREW, K
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1988, 38 (02) : 16 - 18
  • [4] COMPRESSION WOOD IN ROOTED CUTTINGS OF DOUGLAS-FIR
    STARBUCK, CJ
    ROBERTS, AN
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1983, 57 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [5] Effect of Lamina Thickness on Parallel-to-Grain Strength in Small Douglas-Fir Samples
    Shmulsky, Rubin
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2004, 9 (03) : 308 - 309
  • [6] COMPARATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CORKBARK FIR AND DOUGLAS-FIR TO DOUGLAS-FIR DWARF MISTLETOE
    MATHIASEN, RL
    FOREST SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (03) : 842 - 847
  • [7] WATER REGIME OF DOUGLAS-FIR AND FOREST STANDS WITH DOUGLAS-FIR: REVIEW
    Sach, Frantisek
    Cernohous, Vladimir
    Kacalek, Dusan
    REPORTS OF FORESTRY RESEARCH-ZPRAVY LESNICKEHO VYZKUMU, 2019, 64 (03): : 149 - 154
  • [8] Water regime of douglas-fir and forest stands with douglas-fir: Review
    Šach, Frantisek
    Černohous, Vladimír
    Kacálek, Dusan
    Zpravy Lesnickeho Vyzkumu, 2019, 64 (03): : 149 - 154
  • [9] DOUGLAS-FIR SHELTERWOOD
    STARKER, TJ
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1970, 68 (07) : 393 - &
  • [10] CYTOKININS IN DOUGLAS-FIR
    Morris, J. W.
    Lavender, D. P.
    Zaerr, J. B.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 72 : 26 - 26