Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy

被引:155
|
作者
Kupelian, PA
Katcher, J
Levin, HS
Klein, EA
机构
[1] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT PATHOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[2] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT UROL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prognostic factors; prostatectomy; prostate specific antigen; radiotherapy; androgen suppression; RADIATION-THERAPY; FOLLOW-UP; ANTIGEN; PREDICTOR; RADIOTHERAPY; PROGRESSION; MANAGEMENT; EXTENSION; MARGINS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00590-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is extensively used in case selection and outcome evaluation after treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Careful case selection can have a profound impact on pathologic findings and ultimate outcome. In addition, salvage treatment is frequently initiated at the time of biochemical relapse rather than clinical recurrence. Consequently, patterns of failure can be significantly altered compared to previous times when PSA was not available. To better understand the impact of PSA on pathologic findings, outcome, and salvage treatment, we reviewed our experience in the PSA era with clinical Stage T1-2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods and Materials: Between 1987 and 1993, 423 cases could be identified with clinical Stage T1-2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. The distribution of cases by pretreatment PSA levels was as follows: less than or equal to 4 ng/ml (18%), 4-10 ng/ml (42%), 10-20 ng/ml (21%), >20 ng/ml (14%), and unknown (5%). The median pretreatment PSA level for the entire group was 8.0 ng/ml. Sixteen patients received adjuvant or neoadjuvant androgen suppression and 13 received postoperative radiotherapy. Only 31 patients (7%) had pathologically positive pelvic lymph nodes. The overall margin involvement rate was 46%. Fifty-three percent of patients had surgical Gleason scores greater than or equal to 7, and 65% had extracapsular extension. The median follow-up time was 41 months. Results: The projected overall survival at 7 years after surgery was 90%. The 5-year clinical relapse-free survival rate was 84%. At 5 years, the local control and distant failure rates were 92% and 91%, respectively. Biochemical relapse was defined as a detectable or rising PSA level after prostatectomy. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate was 59%. The 5-year RFS was 88% in patients with preoperative PSA levels less than or equal to 4, 62% for 4-10, 48% for 10-20, and 31% for >20. Combining the two independent preoperative variables, IPSA and biopsy GS (bGS), two risks groups were defined: low risk [initial PSA (iPSA) levels less than or equal to 10.0 and bGS less than or equal to 6] and high risk (IPSA levels >10.0 ng/ml or bGS greater than or equal to 7). The 5-year bRFS rate for the low-risk cases was 81% vs. 40% for high-risk cases (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, three factors independently predicted biochemical relapse: iPSA levels (p = 0.005), Gleason score from the surgical specimen (sGS) (p = 0.002), and positive surgical margins (p less than or equal to 0.001). The 5-year bRFS rates for margin positive vs. margin negative patients were 37% vs. 78%, respectively. The 5-year bRFS rates for GS greater than or equal to 7 vs. GS greater than or equal to 6 were 42% vs. 80%, respectively. All clinical relapses were accompanied by a rise in PSA. In patients who manifested biochemical failure followed by a clinical failure, the median interval between the PSA rise and clinical failure was 19 months (range 7-71). Margin involvement was the only independent predictor of local failure (p = 0.019). The 5-year local failure-free survival for negative margin cases was 96% vs. 87% for positive margin cases (p = 0.012). Lymph node (LN) involvement and high-risk group were the two independent predictors of distant failure. The 5-year distant failure-free survival for negative LN cases was 94% vs. 67% for positive LN cases (p < 0.001). The 5-year distant failure-free survival for low-risk cases was 97% vs. 85% for high-risk cases (p = 0.005). For the 124 patients failing biochemically, 85 were observed and 39 were treated either with radiation or androgen deprivation. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the clinical disease relapse-free survival was 79% for the treated patients vs. only 32% for the patients observed (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pretreatment PSA is the most potent clinical factor independently predicting biochemical relapse, thereby allowing markedly better case selection. Achieving negative margins, even in relatively advanced disease, provides excellent long-term local control. Rising postsurgical serum PSA levels accurately predict subsequent clinical failures; instituting salvage therapy promptly after biochemical failure significantly reduces the risk of further clinical recurrences. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1052
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Balingit, J. D. V.
    Sapno, L.
    Evangelista, C.
    Lusaya, D.
    Serrano, D.
    Castillo, J.
    So, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 95 - 96
  • [2] Efficacy of radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer patients and analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, Xinping
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Lin, Yang
    Tian, Yuxin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (06): : 2623 - 2628
  • [3] Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: Impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Peck, Hugh J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04): : 1277 - 1280
  • [4] Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: clinical outcomes and factors influencing biochemical recurrence
    Fukuda, Ichiro
    Aoki, Manabu
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Ikeda, Koshi
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 192 (06) : 2663 - 2671
  • [5] Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: clinical outcomes and factors influencing biochemical recurrence
    Ichiro Fukuda
    Manabu Aoki
    Takahiro Kimura
    Koshi Ikeda
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2023, 192 : 2663 - 2671
  • [6] Factors predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy among patients with clinical T3 prostate cancer
    Otsuka, Masafumi
    Kamasako, Tomohiko
    Uemura, Toshihiro
    Takeshita, Nobushige
    Shinozaki, Tetsuo
    Kobayashi, Masayuki
    Komaru, Atsushi
    Fukasawa, Satoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 48 (08) : 760 - 764
  • [7] Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: Impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy - Comment
    Cohen, Michael B.
    Hinz, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04): : 1280 - 1281
  • [8] Radical prostatectomy for stage T1a-T1b prostate cancer: Analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Roscigno, Marco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Cestari, Andrea
    Buffi, Nicolo
    Lesma, Arianna
    Freschi, Massimo
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 116 - 116
  • [9] Factors affecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with positive and negative surgical margin
    Celik, Serdar
    Eker, Anil
    Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
    Bolat, Deniz
    Basmaci, Ismail
    Sefik, Ertugrul
    Degirmenci, Tansu
    Gunlusoy, Bulent
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (04) : 178 - 184
  • [10] Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: Analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Freschi, Massimo
    Briganti, Alberto
    Salonia, Andrea
    Gallina, Andrea
    Colombo, Renzo
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (01) : 118 - 125