Obama and 2012: Still a Racial Cost to Pay?

被引:14
|
作者
Tien, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Nadeau, Richard [3 ]
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. [4 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Hunter Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
PREJUDICE; PRESIDENT; FORECAST; VOTE; RACE;
D O I
10.1017/S1049096512000704
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Will President Obama lose votes in 2012 because of racial prejudice? For 2008, we estimated, via a carefully controlled, national survey-based study, that on balance he lost about five percentage points in popular vote share due to intolerance for his race on the part of some voters. What about 2012? There are at least three possibilities: (1) the presidency has become postracial, and the vote will register no racial cost; (2) intolerance has increased, and the vote will register an increased racial cost; and (3) intolerance has decreased, and the vote will register a decreased racial cost. Our evidence, drawn from an analysis comparable to that carried out for 2008, suggests Obama will pay a racial cost of three percentage points in popular vote share. In other words, his candidacy will experience a decrease in racial cost, if a small one. In 2008, this racial cost denied Obama a landslide victory. In the context of a closer election in 2012, this persistent racial cost, even smaller in size, could perhaps cost him his reelection.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 595
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条