Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments

被引:157
|
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Mueller, Daniel B.
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Aluminum; Greenhouse gas emissions; Recycling; Allocation; Lightweighting; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC ALLOCATION; METALS INDUSTRY; MATERIAL FLOW; LCA; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; INVENTORY; ENERGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.030
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article discusses the state of the practice, strength, and weakness of life cycle assessments (LCA) for achieving sustainability goals in the aluminum industry. Notable features of the reviewed LCAs include a limited geographical and life cycle scope and differentiated system boundaries, a common practice to use industry-wide inventory data, a polarized debate on allocation of aluminum recycling, and a predominant focus on energy and greenhouse gas emissions environmental metrics. Not surprisingly, the various studies have produced significantly different results, e.g., the greenhouse gas emissions per kilogram primary aluminum production range from 5.92 to 41.10 kg CO2-equivalent and the "break-even point" (the point when the fuel economy benefits of the lighter aluminum vehicle offset added emissions from the production stage) of vehicles lightweighting ranges from 50,000 to 250,000 km. These variations relate not only to real world differences (e.g., temporal and geographical characteristics), but also partly to data uncertainties and methodological choices. Particularly, the recyclability, long lifetime, and environmental benefits in the use phase of aluminum pose great challenges for LCA methodology, especially for the allocation of recycling. The identified uncertainties and deficiencies can serve as an important base for further improvement of subsequent LCA applications in the aluminum industry. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 117
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessments Guide Sustainability
    Sand, Claire Koelsch
    Boz, Ziynet
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 74 (05) : 80 - +
  • [2] Airport sustainability through life cycle assessments: A systematic literature review
    Bahman, Nahed
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (03) : 1268 - 1277
  • [3] Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments
    Jorgensen, Andreas
    Dreyer, Louise C.
    Wangel, Arne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (06): : 828 - 839
  • [4] Roadway Construction Sustainability Impacts Review of Life-Cycle Assessments
    Muench, Stephen T.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2151) : 36 - 45
  • [5] Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments
    Andreas Jørgensen
    Louise C. Dreyer
    Arne Wangel
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 828 - 839
  • [6] Use of life cycle assessments in the construction sector: critical review
    Dossche, Charlotte
    Boel, Veerle
    De Corte, Wouter
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURES FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, 2017, 171 : 302 - 311
  • [7] Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers-A critical review
    Yates, Madeleine R.
    Barlow, Claire Y.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2013, 78 : 54 - 66
  • [8] Industry, life cycle assessment and sustainability
    Selmes, D
    Boron, S
    Murray, K
    1997 JUBILEE RESEARCH EVENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 153 - 156
  • [9] Application of Life Cycle Assessment in the pharmaceutical industry: A critical review
    Chen, Zhengyun
    Lian, Justin Z.
    Zhu, Hengyi
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Zhang, Yulong
    Xiang, Xinyu
    Huang, Dechun
    Tjokro, Kristie
    Barbarossa, Valerio
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Dong, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 459
  • [10] Sustainability: Addressing the Life Cycle of Cereal Food Products
    Baldwin, C.
    CEREAL FOODS WORLD, 2010, 55 (04) : 177 - 179