Airline investments in exclusive airport facilities: Timing decisions under demand ambiguity

被引:15
|
作者
Zheng, Shiyuan [1 ]
Fu, Xiaowen [2 ]
Jiang, Changmin [3 ,4 ]
Ge, Ying-En [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[5] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Lloyds Register Fdn Int Inst Transport & Environm, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Airport investment; Investment timing; Knightian uncertainty; Real options; Vertical arrangements; Multiple prior expected utility (MEU); CAPACITY CHOICE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRADE-OFF; COMPETITION; CONGESTION; UNCERTAINTY; ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; ECONOMICS; CHARGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we study the timing decision of airlines' investments in exclusive airport facilities in the presence of demand ambiguity and competition. We model the investment decision as a real options problem under ambiguity. An airline's ambiguity-averse preferences are modeled using the multiple prior expected utility form. We obtain the optimal investment timing rule for the airline and find that it requires the airline's expected present value of its future incremental profit from investing to exceed the investment cost by the option value multiplier. We then compare the airline's optimal investment timing rule to the social optimum and discuss two possible subsidy policies, a lump-sum subsidy and a per-unit subsidy, with which the government can align the airline's investment timing rule with the social optimum. We characterize the stepwise structure of both subsidy policies, in which the optimal time to invest in an exclusive terminal depends on three thresholds: the social optimum, the airline's break-even point, and a combination of the social optimum and the airline optimum. We conclude that the two subsidy policies have equivalent effects when the government and the airline have the same ambiguity levels, as they lead to the same investment timing and require the same amount of government funds. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 363
页数:21
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Capacity investment model for airport facilities under demand uncertainty
    Sun, Yanshuo
    Schonfeld, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 50 (08) : 1896 - 1911
  • [2] Timing of service investments for retailers under competition and demand uncertainty
    Perdikaki, Olga
    Kostamis, Dimitris
    Swaminathan, Jayashankar M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (01) : 188 - 201
  • [3] Planning the Airport Terminal Facilities Based on Traffic Demand Forecast and Dominant Share of Airline Business Model: Case Study of Pula Airport
    Pivac, Jelena
    Stimac, Igor
    Bartulovic, Dajana
    Lonjak, Ivan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (05):
  • [4] Utilization Management and Pricing of Parking Facilities Under Uncertain Demand and User Decisions
    Mirheli, Amir
    Hajibabai, Leila
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 21 (05) : 2167 - 2179
  • [5] Timing and green decisions for competitive manufacturers under demand uncertainty and risk aversion
    Li, Hongmei
    Tan, Yingshuang
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024, 45 (04) : 2501 - 2515
  • [6] Airline capacity decisions under supply-demand equilibrium of Australia's domestic aviation market
    Mohammadian, Iman
    Abareshi, Ahmad
    Abbasi, Babak
    Goh, Mark
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 119 : 108 - 121