CONCEPTS FOR EVALUATION OF IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL RADIOLOGY

被引:1
|
作者
Zscherpel, U. [1 ]
Ewert, U. [1 ]
Jechow, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] BAM Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Computed Radiography; Non Destructive Testing; Image Quality; Signal-to-Noise Ratio; Contrast-to-Noise Ratio; Imaging Plates; Weld Inspection; Film Replacement; Standards;
D O I
10.1063/1.4716281
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Concepts for digital image evaluation are presented for Computed Radiography (CR) and Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs) used for weld inspection. The precise DDA calibration yields an extra ordinary increase of contrast sensitivity up to 10 times in relation to film radiography. Restrictions in spatial resolution caused by pixel size of the DDA are compensated by increased contrast sensitivity. First CR standards were published in 2005 to support the application of phosphor imaging plates in lieu of X-ray film, but they need already a revision based on experiences reported by many users. One of the key concepts is the usage of signal-to-noise (SNR) measurements as equivalent to the optical density of film and film system class. The contrast sensitivity, measured by IQI visibility, depends on three essential parameters: The basic spatial resolution (SRb) of the radiographic image, the achieved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the specific contrast (mu(eff) - effective attenuation coefficient). Knowing these 3 parameters for the given exposure condition, inspected material and monitor viewing condition permits the calculation of the just visible IQI element. Furthermore, this enables the optimization of exposure conditions. The new ISO/FDIS 17636-2 describes the practice for digital radiography with CR and DDAs. It considers the first time compensation principles, derived from the three essential parameters. The consequences are described.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 596
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image quality evaluation of a direct digital radiography detector operating in a UK radiology department
    Kengyelics, SM
    Cowen, AR
    Davies, AG
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 24 - 35
  • [2] Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology
    Salat, D.
    Nikodemova, D.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 147 - 149
  • [3] Dose and image quality in digital imaging and interventional radiology
    Malone, JF
    Boyle, G
    Marsh, DM
    Teunen, D
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (1-2) : 9 - 9
  • [4] Dose and image quality in digital imaging and interventional radiology
    Malone, JF
    Boyle, G
    Marsh, DM
    Teunen, D
    DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (DIMOND), 2001, : 9 - 9
  • [5] Evaluation of the display quality of different modalities in digital radiology
    Lehmkuhl, L
    Mulzer, J
    Teichgraeber, U
    Gillessen, C
    Ehrenstein, T
    Ricke, J
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (07): : 1031 - 1038
  • [6] Quality Evaluation of Digital Image Watermarking
    Zhang, Xinhong
    Zhang, Fan
    Xu, Yuli
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL NETWORKS - ISNN 2011, PT II, 2011, 6676 : 241 - 250
  • [7] Evaluation of image quality in megavoltage digital tomosynthesis
    Descovich, M.
    Morin, O.
    Aubry, J.
    Aubin, M.
    Chen, H.
    Chen, J.
    Bani-Hashemi, A.
    Geffen, M.
    Kelly, K.
    Pang, G.
    Pouliot, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2281 - 2281
  • [8] Study on the methods of digital image quality evaluation
    Kim, JS
    Cho, MS
    Choi, BT
    TENCON 2004 - 2004 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS A-D, PROCEEDINGS: ANALOG AND DIGITAL TECHNIQUES IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, : A359 - A362
  • [9] PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF DIGITAL IMAGE COMPLETION QUALITY
    Dang Thanh Trung
    Beghdadi, Azeddine
    Larabi, Mohamed-Chaker
    2013 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2013,
  • [10] Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology
    Fernandez, J. M.
    Ordiales, J. M.
    Guibelalde, E.
    Prieto, C.
    Vano, E.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 140 - 143