Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation: The Alcatel Alenia Space case study

被引:43
|
作者
Alemanni, Marco
Alessia, Grimaldi
Tornincasa, Stefano [1 ]
Vezzetti, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Turin, Italy
关键词
Product Lifecycle Management; product development management; extended enterprise; one-of-a-kind company; collaborative management;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2008.06.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
From a theoretical point of view, people are used to think that the adoption of innovative business solutions, for optimizing the product lifecycle, should always guarantee a sufficient return on the investment (ROI), even if the concrete benefits that the investment has given to the company are sometimes difficult to evaluate. Looking at the technical literature it is possible to find a lot of ROI's estimation metrics for the evaluation of business strategies, even if after the analysis of the theoretical concepts no one faces with a real implementation of the methodology proposed. This paper proposes a solution, based on the key performance indicator (KPI) method, for evaluating the benefits introduced by the adoption of a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) tool in a one of a kind company. The methods have been validated with its implementation into an Aerospace and Defence company(Alcatel Alenia Space), highlighting the improvement created by the implementation of the PLM solution in the everyday activities and showing the system's contribution for some key-process as configuration, change and documentation. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 841
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: MONITORING AND EVALUATION
    Dumitrescu, Andreea
    Dumitriu, Dan
    MANAGEMENT - FACING NEW TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES, ICMIE 2013, 2013, : 423 - 429
  • [2] Describing the Benefits of Residency Training through Key Performance Indicators
    Mysak, T.
    Neilson, S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2016, 69 (01): : 68 - 69
  • [4] Evaluation of Interested Parties by Key Performance Indicators
    Stanojkovic, Srdan B.
    Cvetkovic, Dragan
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2018, 25 : 205 - 210
  • [5] KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE EVALUATION OF BALANCED LINES
    Maerz, Lothar
    2012 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2012,
  • [6] Milestone-Oriented Usage of Key Performance Indicators - An Industrial Case Study
    Staron, Miroslaw
    Niesel, Kent
    Bauman, Niclas
    E-INFORMATICA SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) : 217 - 236
  • [7] Managing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): A Case Study at an Aerospace Manufacturing Facility
    Abdullah, Rohana
    Mohamad, Effendi
    Muhamad, Mohd. Razali
    KMICE 2008 - KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2008 - TRANSFERRING, MANAGING AND MAINTAINING KNOWLEDGE FOR NATION CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT, 2008, : 221 - 225
  • [8] Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya
    Eshtaiwi, Mohamed
    Badi, Ibrahim
    Abdulshahed, Ali
    Erkan, Turan Erman
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 68 : 28 - 34
  • [9] On-line estimation of reactor key performance indicators: An industrial case study
    Musch, H
    List, T
    Dempf, D
    Heyen, G
    EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 14, 2004, 18 : 247 - 252
  • [10] EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF RAILWAY ITS
    Mlinaric, Tomislav Josip
    Dordevic, Boban
    Krmac, Evelin
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 30 (04): : 491 - 500