Comparison of the destructive and non-destructive sampling techniques for microbiological control of meat surfaces - 1. swine carcase

被引:0
|
作者
Kleiner, U [1 ]
Hilgert, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Hsch Analt FH, Fachbereich Landwirtschaft Okotrophol Landespfleg, D-06406 Bernburg, Germany
来源
FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT | 2004年 / 84卷 / 03期
关键词
meat surfaces; sampling techniques; decision; 2001/471/EG; carcase;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
According to the decision of 2001/471/EC, published in Germany by the announcement of BMVEL (2001) on the 29th November 2001, all meat suppliers have to conduct within the scope of the HACCP methodology principle obligatory microbiological checks on general hygiene since the 1st of July 2003. This involves the check up of the cleaning and disinfection success in the slaughterhouses and cutting plants as well as the bacteriological surface contamination of meat. The decision allows as sampling methods particularly destructive methods, but also non-destructive methods on the basis of swabbing for carcases. If other methods are used for the sampling, these methods have to be verified in comparison to the standard method. With the aim of verification of sampling methods, we tested the. destructive and different non-destructive methods (swabbing and contact plate methods) for the determination of the surface germ contamination of pork in a meat company. In this first publication we introduce the results of our examination on pork carcases. Under defined conditions we came to the result that not only the swabbing method but also contact plate methods are suitable for bacteriological samples. Furthermore, the comparability of the received results with the reference method (destructive method) can be guaranteed by the adoption of a simple algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 104
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the destructive and non-destructive sampling techniques for microbiological control of meat surfaces - 2. Sections of swine
    Kleiner, U
    Hilgert, S
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2004, 84 (04): : 146 - 149
  • [2] COMPARISON BETWEEN DESTRUCTIVE AND NON-DESTRUCTIVE SAMPLING OF SESSILE EPIBENTHIC ORGANISMS
    SCHOENER, A
    GREENE, CH
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1981, 26 (04) : 770 - 774
  • [3] Modeling the non-destructive control of road surfaces compaction
    Prokopev, A. P.
    Nabizhanov, Zh, I
    Ivanchura, V. I.
    Emelyanov, R. T.
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON APPLIED PHYSICS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND ENGINEERING (APITECH-2019), 2019, 1399
  • [4] COMPARISON OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES FOR CRACK INSPECTION
    Aulin, Axel
    Shahzad, Khurram
    MacKenzie, Robert
    Bott, Steven
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE (IPC2020), VOL 1, 2020,
  • [5] Analysis of stainless steel welded joints: a comparison between destructive and non-destructive techniques
    Meola, C
    Squillace, A
    Minutolo, FMC
    Morace, RE
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 155 : 1893 - 1899
  • [6] Surface contamination measurement and control by non-destructive techniques
    Chandra, T.
    Aurora, A.
    Metals forum, 1991, 15 (03): : 274 - 278
  • [7] NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING IN THE PAPER-MILL .1. EQUIPMENT AND TECHNIQUES
    MOSKAL, MD
    TAPPI, 1982, 65 (04): : 43 - 46
  • [8] Non-Destructive Spectroscopic and Imaging Techniques for the Detection of Processed Meat Fraud
    Edwards, Kiah
    Manley, Marena
    Hoffman, Louwrens C.
    Williams, Paul J.
    FOODS, 2021, 10 (02)
  • [9] Non-Destructive Techniques for the Analysis and Evaluation of Meat Quality and Safety: A Review
    Wu, Xiaohong
    Liang, Xinyue
    Wang, Yixuan
    Wu, Bin
    Sun, Jun
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (22)
  • [10] Comparison of neutron radiography with other non-destructive techniques for the inspection of CF188 flight control surfaces
    Bennett, LGI
    Chalovich, TR
    Lewis, WJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2005, 52 (01) : 334 - 337