Resources Preservice Teachers Use to Think about Student Writing

被引:0
|
作者
Zuidema, Leah A. [1 ]
Fredricksen, James E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dordt Coll, Sioux Falls, SD 51250 USA
[2] Boise State Univ, Boise, ID 83725 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article identifies five categories of resources that preservice teachers drew on as they considered student writing and planned their own approaches to assessing and teaching writing. Identifying these resources helps us better understand how beginning writing teachers think about student writing and better understand mismatches that commonly occur between what teacher educators teach and what new teachers actually do. Our study builds on literature that considers how writing teachers are prepared, extends research about how preservice teachers use what they learn, and adds layers of detail to literature about the resources that beginning teachers draw upon to aid and support them in their work. The pedagogical and research projects described in this study stem from a communities-of-practice framework. Our methods surfaced preservice teachers' claims about writing and the resources they drew upon to support those claims. Drawing upon our rhetorical view of writing, we worked inductively to identify these claims and resources, using grounded analysis of transcripts from preservice teachers' VoiceThread conversations to develop a taxonomy of 15 resources grouped into 5 categories: understanding of students and student writing; knowledge of context; colleagues; roles; and writing. This research has implications for educators and researchers working in teacher preparation. Scaffolded instruction is essential to help beginning teachers use particular resources and to employ resources in ways connected with rhetorical conceptual frameworks. To that end, the taxonomy of resources can be used as a tool for individual and programmatic assessment, as well as to facilitate scaffolded instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 36
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Constructing meaning about literacy difficulties: preservice teachers beginning to think about pedagogy
    Mallette, MH
    Kile, RS
    Smith, MM
    McKinney, M
    Readence, JE
    TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 16 (5-6) : 593 - 612
  • [2] HELPING STUDENT-TEACHERS THINK ABOUT TEACHING
    BOLIN, FS
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 1988, 39 (02) : 48 - 54
  • [3] Writing Development Over Time: Examining Preservice Teachers' Attitudes and Beliefs About Writing
    Hall, Anna
    Grisham-Brown, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 32 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [4] Uncovering preservice teachers' beliefs about diversity through reflective writing
    Kyles, Carli R.
    Olafson, Lori
    URBAN EDUCATION, 2008, 43 (05) : 500 - 518
  • [5] PRESERVICE TEACHERS METAPHORS ABOUT ICT USE IN TEACHING
    Ozcinar, Huseyin
    Salar, Hursit
    EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, : 6293 - 6302
  • [6] PROMINENT CONTENT VOCABULARY STRATEGIES AND WHAT SECONDARY PRESERVICE TEACHERS THINK ABOUT THEM
    Hedrick, Wanda B.
    Harmon, Janis M.
    Wood, Karen
    READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (05) : 443 - 470
  • [7] Encouraging Shifts in Preservice Teachers' Beliefs About Writing and Plans for Future Instruction
    Hall, Anna H.
    Gao, Qianyi
    Hirsch, Shanna
    EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2021, 49 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [8] Encouraging Shifts in Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs About Writing and Plans for Future Instruction
    Anna H. Hall
    Qianyi Gao
    Shanna Hirsch
    Early Childhood Education Journal, 2021, 49 : 61 - 70
  • [9] Expert and preservice secondary teachers' competencies for noticing student thinking about modelling
    Cai, Jinfa
    LaRochelle, Raymond
    Hwang, Stephen
    Kaiser, Gabriele
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2022, 109 (02) : 431 - 453
  • [10] Expert and preservice secondary teachers’ competencies for noticing student thinking about modelling
    Jinfa Cai
    Raymond LaRochelle
    Stephen Hwang
    Gabriele Kaiser
    Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2022, 109 : 431 - 453