Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients

被引:61
|
作者
Cagnoni, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.81
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Liposomal amphotercin B was compared with conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Using a composite end-point, the two drugs were equivalent in overall efficacy. However, the liposomal amphotericin B treatment group had fewer proven fungal infections, fewer infusion-related side effects and less nephrotoxicity. Patient data from that study were analysed to compare the pharmacoeconomics of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B therapy. Itemized billing data from 414 patients were collected and analysed. Hospital costs from first dose were significantly higher for all patients who received liposomal amphotericin B ($48962 versus $43183, P=0.02). However, hospital costs were very sensitive to the cost of the study medication ($39648 versus $43048, when acquisition costs are not included, P=0.4). Using decision analysis models and sensitivity analyses to vary the cost of study medications and risk of nephrotoxicity, the break-even points for the cost of liposomal therapy were calculated to range from $72 to $87 per 50 mg for all patients, and $83 to $112 per 50 mg in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. Therefore, the drug acquisition costs and the risk of nephrotoxicity are important factors in determining the cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients. In a recent randomized double-blind study comparing liposomal amphotericin B at 3 or 5 mg/kg/day with amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) 5 mg/kg/day as empirical antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia, liposomal amphotericin B was associated with less toxicity than ABLC, both in terms of infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. The incidence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity was: liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day, 14%; liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg/day, 15%; and ABLC, 42% (P<0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients
    Cagnoni, PJ
    Walsh, TJ
    Prendergast, MM
    Bodensteiner, D
    Hiemenz, S
    Greenberg, RN
    Arndt, CAS
    Schuster, M
    Seibel, N
    Yeldandi, V
    Tong, KB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) : 2476 - 2483
  • [3] Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer
    Allan R. Tunkel
    Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2000, 2 (5) : 389 - 390
  • [4] Improved safety and efficacy of amBisome (liposomal amphotericin B) compared with amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.
    Cagnoni, PJ
    Grethlein, S
    Korones, DN
    Goldman, M
    Kaizer, H
    BLOOD, 1997, 90 (10) : 1866 - 1866
  • [5] A randomized comparison of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B for the treatment of pyrexia of unknown origin in neutropenic patients
    Prentice, HG
    Hann, IM
    Herbrecht, R
    Aoun, M
    Kvaloy, S
    Catovsky, D
    Pinkerton, CR
    Schey, SA
    Jacobs, F
    Oakhill, A
    Stevens, RF
    Darbyshire, PJ
    Gibson, BES
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1997, 98 (03) : 711 - 718
  • [6] Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Liposomal Amphotericin B versus Voriconazole for Empirical Treatment of Febrile Neutropenia
    Curtis D. Collins
    Emily R. Stuntebeck
    Daryl D. DePestel
    James G. Stevenson
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2007, 27 : 233 - 241
  • [7] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia
    Collins, Curtis D.
    Stuntebeck, Emily R.
    DePestel, Daryl D.
    Stevenson, James G.
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2007, 27 (04) : 233 - 241
  • [8] A randomized comparative trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (Fungisome TM ) versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in India
    Jadhav, M. P.
    Shinde, V. M.
    Chandrakala, S.
    Jijina, F.
    Menon, H.
    Arora, B.
    Kurkure, P. A.
    Parikh, P. M.
    Kshirsagar, N. A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 49 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [9] MICAFUNGIN VERSUS LIPOSOMAL AMPHOTERICIN B FOR EMPIRICAL ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Oyake, T.
    Sugawara, N.
    Fujisawa, Y.
    Sasaki, R.
    Izumida, W.
    Mine, T.
    Asahi, M.
    Suzuki, Y.
    Okano, Y.
    Fujishima, Y.
    Tsukushi, Y.
    Aoki, Y.
    Kowata, S.
    Hanamura, I.
    Murai, K.
    Ito, S.
    Ishida, Y.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2017, 102 : 253 - 253
  • [10] Pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B in neutropenic cancer patients
    Eldem, T
    Arican-Cellat, N
    Agabeyoglu, I
    Akova, M
    Kansu, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2001, 213 (1-2) : 153 - 161