N0539 phase II trial of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (now Alliance) trial

被引:4
|
作者
Tan, W. W. [1 ]
Dueck, A. C. [2 ]
Flynn, P. [3 ]
Steen, P. [4 ]
Anderson, D. [3 ]
Rowland, K. [5 ]
Northfelt, D. [6 ]
Perez, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Oncol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Sect Biostat, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Metro Minnesota CCOP, St Louis Pk, MN USA
[4] Sanford Med Ctr, Fargo, ND USA
[5] Carle Canc Ctr, Urbana, IL USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
antiangiogenesis agent; aromatase inhibitor resistance; bevacizumab; estrogen receptor antagonist; fulvestrant; metastatic breast cancer; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; DOUBLE-BLIND; THERAPY; ANASTROZOLE; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdt213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Based on preclinical studies, the vascular endothelial pathway is an important mechanism for estrogen receptor resistance. We conducted a phase II study of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with aromatase inhibitor pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Patients and methods: A single-stage phase II study was conducted with these objectives: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, toxic effect, and overall survival. Regimen: 250 mg fulvestrant days 1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and 10 mg/kg bevacizumab days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle. Results: At interim analysis, 20 eligible patients initiated treatment, 11 were progression free and on treatment at 3 months, not meeting the protocol-specified efficacy requirements (at least 12 of 20). Accrual remained open during interim analysis with 36 patients enrolling before final study closure. Among the 33 eligible patients, the median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-10.1 months]. Of the 18 with measurable disease, 4 (22%) patients (95% CI 6% to 48%) had a confirmed tumor response (1 complete, 3 partial). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension 3 (9%) and headache 3 (9%). Conclusions: The fulvestrant/bevacizumab combination is safe and tolerable; however, it did not meet its statistical end point.
引用
收藏
页码:2548 / 2554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] N0539 Phase II Trial of Fulvstrant and Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previouslly Treated with an Aromatase Inhibitor: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial
    Tan, W. W.
    Dueck, A. C.
    Flynn, P.
    Steen, P.
    Anderson, D.
    Rowland, K.
    Nothfeldt, D.
    Lingle, W.
    Copland, J.
    Perez, E. A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 738S - 738S
  • [2] A phase II trial of anlotinib and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor
    Wang, X.
    Huang, J.
    Wenyan, C.
    Sun, Z.
    Wei, S.
    Wang, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S371 - S371
  • [3] Evaluation of fulvestrant in women with advanced breast cancer and progression on prior aromatase inhibitor therapy: a phase II trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.
    Ingle, JN
    Rowland, KM
    Suman, VJ
    Mirchandani, D
    Bernath, AM
    Camoriano, JK
    Perez, EA
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 : S38 - S38
  • [4] North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0537: Phase II Trial of VEGF-Trap in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and/or a Taxane
    Sideras, Kostandinos
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Hobday, Timothy J.
    Rowland, Kendrith M., Jr.
    Allred, Jacob B.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Lingle, Wilma L.
    Behrens, Robert J.
    Fitch, Tom R.
    Nikcevich, Daniel A.
    Perez, Edith A.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2012, 12 (06) : 387 - 391
  • [5] Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Exposed to Anthracyclines or Taxanes: North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic Trial N0336
    Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro
    Morton, Roscoe F.
    Hillman, David W.
    Lingle, Wilma L.
    Rowland, Kendrith M., Jr.
    Wiesenfeld, Martin
    Flynn, Patrick J.
    Fitch, Tom R.
    Perez, Edith A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [6] Randomized Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant with or without Dasatinib in Postmenopausal Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with an Aromatase Inhibitor.
    Wright, G. L.
    Blum, J.
    Krekow, L. K.
    McIntyre, K. J.
    Wilks, S. T.
    Rabe, A. C.
    Vukelja, S. J.
    Andersen, J. C.
    Wang, Y.
    Asmar, L.
    O'Shaughnessy, J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [7] Fulvestrant in women with advanced breast cancer after progression on prior aromatase inhibitor therapy: North central cancer treatment group trial N0032
    Ingle, JN
    Suman, VJ
    Rowland, KM
    Mirchandani, D
    Bernath, AM
    Camoriano, JK
    Fishkin, PAS
    Nikcevich, DA
    Perez, EA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (07) : 1052 - 1056
  • [8] Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer - A north central cancer treatment group trial
    Burch, PA
    Mailliard, JA
    Hillman, DW
    Perez, EA
    Krook, JE
    Rowland, KM
    Veeder, MH
    Cannon, MW
    Ingle, JN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (02): : 195 - 200
  • [9] N0332 phase II trial of weekly irinotecan and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial
    Tan, W. W.
    Hillman, D.
    Salim, M.
    Northfelt, D. W.
    Anderseon, D. M.
    Stella, P. J.
    Niedringhaus, R.
    Bernath, A. M.
    Gamini, S. S.
    Frances, P.
    Perez, P. A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 106 : S71 - S72
  • [10] A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer
    Cobleigh, MA
    Langmuir, VK
    Sledge, GW
    Miller, KD
    Haney, L
    Novotny, WF
    Reimann, JD
    Vassel, A
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (05) : 117 - 124