The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2: Further psychometric testing

被引:36
|
作者
Vellone, Ercole [1 ]
De Maria, Maddalena [1 ]
Iovino, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Barbaranelli, Claudio [3 ]
Zeffiro, Valentina [1 ]
Pucciarelli, Gianluca [1 ]
Durante, Angela [1 ]
Alvaro, Rosaria [1 ]
Riegel, Barbara [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Via Montpellier 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Sch Nursing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
heart failure; psychometrics; reliability; self‐ care; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITUATION-SPECIFIC THEORY; FIT INDEXES; RELIABILITY; ADULTS; DETERMINANTS; SENSITIVITY; SCALES;
D O I
10.1002/nur.22083
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Clinicians and researchers need valid and reliable instruments to evaluate heart failure (HF) self-care. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a theoretically driven instrument developed for this purpose. The SCHFI measures self-care with three scales: self-care maintenance, measuring behaviors to maintain HF stability; symptom perception, measuring monitoring behaviors; and self-care management, assessing the response to symptoms. After the theory underpinning the SCHFI was updated, the instrument was updated to version 7.2 but it was only tested in the United States. In this study we tested the psychometric characteristics (structural and construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability) of the SCHFI v.7.2 in an Italian population of HF patients. We used a cross-sectional design to study 280 HF patients with additional data collected after 2 weeks for test-retest reliability. Adults with HF (mean age 75.6 (+/- 10.8); 70.8% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes II and III) were enrolled from six centers across Italy. Confirmatory factor analysis showed supportive structural validity in the three SCHFI v.7.2 scales (CFI from 0.94 to 0.95; RMSEA from 0.05 to 0.07). Internal consistency reliability estimated with Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability ranged between .73 and .88; test-retest reliability ranged between 0.73 and 0.92. Construct validity was supported with significant correlations between the SCHFI v.7.2 scale scores and quality of life, brain natriuretic peptide levels and NYHA class. This study further supports the psychometric characteristics of the SCHFI v.7.2, illustrating that it can be used in clinical practice and research also in an Italian population.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 650
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Self-care of Heart Failure Index Version 7.2
    Li, Fenna
    Lin, Lixia
    Sun, Xingyuan
    Chair, Sekying
    Liu, Xu
    Cao, Xi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2023, 38 (06) : 528 - 536
  • [2] Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2
    Okada, Akiko
    Hayashi, Kanako
    Ichikura, Kanako
    Kato, Naoko P.
    Wakabayashi, Rumi
    Nagao, Noriko
    Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Miyuki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2024, 23 (03) : 305 - 312
  • [3] Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2
    Vellone, Ercole
    Riegel, Barbara
    Cocchieri, Antonello
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    D'Agostino, Fabio
    Antonetti, Giovanni
    Glaser, Dale
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2013, 36 (05) : 500 - 511
  • [4] Psychometric Testing of the Japanese Version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index
    Kato, Naoko
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    Nakayama, Etsuko
    Tsuji, Takako
    Kumagai, Yumiko
    Miura, Chicako
    Komuro, Issei
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2013, 19 (08) : S46 - S46
  • [5] Psychometric testing of the self-care of heart failure index
    Riegel, BJ
    Carlson, B
    Moser, DK
    Carson, J
    Hicks, FD
    Roland, V
    Bormann, JE
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 504 - 504
  • [6] Psychometric testing of the self-care of heart failure index
    Riegel, B
    Carlson, B
    Moser, DK
    Sebern, M
    Hicks, FD
    Roland, V
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2004, 10 (04) : 350 - 360
  • [7] Psychometric Testing of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index
    Riegel, Barbara
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    Carlson, Beverly
    Sethares, Kristen A.
    Daus, Marguerite
    Moser, Debra K.
    Miller, Jennifer
    Osokpo, Onome Henry
    Lee, Solim
    Brown, Stacey
    Vellone, Ercole
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2019, 34 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [8] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Brazilian Version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2
    Avila, Christiane Wahast
    Riegel, Barbara
    Pokorski, Simoni Chiarelli
    Camey, Suzi
    Jacoby Silveira, Luana Claudia
    Rabelo-Silva, Eneida Rejane
    NURSING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 2013
  • [9] The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index: A psychometric study
    Koirala, Binu
    Budhathoki, Chakra
    Dennison-Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    Bhattarai, Priyanka
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (3-4) : 645 - 652
  • [10] The European Heart Failure self-care behaviour scale: psychometric testing of the Hebrew version
    Ben Gal, T.
    Yaari, V.
    Avraham, B.
    Kato, N. P.
    Klompstra, L.
    Stromberg, A.
    Jaarsma, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 246 - 246