Statins and risk of peptic ulcer disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Wijarnpreecha, Karn [1 ]
Panjawatanan, Panadeekarn [2 ]
Leelasinjaroen, Pornchai [3 ]
Ungprasert, Patompong [4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Bassett Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Cooperstown, NY USA
[3] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Augusta, GA USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Rheumat & Immunol Dis, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Statins; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors; Peptic ulcers; Gastric ulcers; Meta-analysis; PREVALENCE; PYLORI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajg.2020.07.007
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objectives: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders worldwide. Recent epidemiologic studies have suggested the protective effect of statins against the development of PUD although the results were inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to summarise all available data. Methods: A literature review was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE database from inception to December 2017. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies that compared the risk of PUD among statins users versus non-users were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: A total of 3 studies (1 case-control and 2 retrospective cohort studies) met the eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of PUD was numerically lower among statins-users compared with non-users with the pooled OR of 0.89. However, the result did not achieve statistical significance with 95% CI of 0.67-1.18. The between-study statistical heterogeneity was high (I-2 = 80%). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the risk of PUD was numerically lower among statin users. However, the results did not reach statistical significance. More studies are still required to further characterise this potential protective effect. (C) 2020 Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 138
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statins and Risk of Peptic Ulcer Disease and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Boonpheng, Boonphiphop
    Al Momani, Laith
    Arikapudi, Sowminya
    Arikapudi, Sowminya
    Bokhari, Ali
    Rupal, Shah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S1551 - S1551
  • [2] Risk factors of perioperative mortality from complicated peptic ulcer disease in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peiffer, Sarah
    Pelton, Matthew
    Keeney, Laura
    Kwon, Eustina G.
    Ofosu-Okromah, Richard
    Acharya, Yubraj
    Chinchilli, Vernon M.
    Soybel, David I.
    Oh, John S.
    Ssentongo, Paddy
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [3] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Transarterial Embolization for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease
    Chang, Jasmine H. E.
    Lye, Tiffany J. Y.
    Zhu, Hong Zhi
    Syn, Nicholas L.
    Tang, Sarah S.
    Gogna, Apoorva
    Chan, Weng Hoong
    Ong, Hock Soo
    Tan, Jeremy Tian Hui
    Lim, Chin Hong
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04) : 576 - +
  • [4] Statins and Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wijarnpreecha, Karn
    Aby, Elizabeth S.
    Ghoz, Hassan
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Lukens, Frank J.
    Harnois, Denise M.
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2020, 29 (04) : 629 - 635
  • [5] STATINS AND RISK OF CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Wijarnpreecha, Karn
    Aby, Elizabeth S.
    Ghoz, Hassan
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Lukens, Frank J.
    Harnois, Denise M.
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 653A - 654A
  • [6] The Global Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer in the World: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nader Salari
    Niloofar Darvishi
    Shamarina Shohaimi
    Yalda Bartina
    Melika Ahmadipanah
    Hamid Reza Salari
    Masoud Mohammadi
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84 : 913 - 921
  • [7] Prevalence of peptic ulcer in Iran: Systematic review and meta-analysis methods
    Sayehmiri, Kourosh
    Abangah, Ghobad
    Kalvandi, Gholamreza
    Tavan, Hamed
    Aazami, Sanaz
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 23
  • [8] The Global Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer in the World: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Salari, Nader
    Darvishi, Niloofar
    Shohaimi, Shamarina
    Bartina, Yalda
    Ahmadipanah, Melika
    Salari, Hamid Reza
    Mohammadi, Masoud
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (05) : 913 - 921
  • [9] Re: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Transarterial Embolization for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease
    Loffroy, Romaric
    Guillen, Kevin
    Chevallier, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09) : 1389 - 1390
  • [10] Statins use and risk of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parsaik, Ajay K.
    Singh, Balwinder
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Singh, Kuljit
    Mascarenhas, Soniya S.
    Williams, Mark D.
    Lapid, Maria I.
    Richardson, Jarrett W.
    West, Colin P.
    Rummans, Teresa A.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2014, 160 : 62 - 67