Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery With Rigid Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review

被引:168
|
作者
Joss, Christof Urs [1 ]
Vassalli, Isabella Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sect Med Dent, Fac Med, Dept Orthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BICORTICAL SCREW FIXATION; SOFT-TISSUE PROFILE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; SKELETAL STABILITY; WIRE FIXATION; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; SURGICAL ADVANCEMENT; SUPRAHYOID MYOTOMY; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate horizontal relapse and its causes in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation of different types. Materials and Methods: A search of the literature was performed in the databases PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta. From 488 articles identified, 24 articles were finally included. Six studies were prospective, and 18 were retrospective. The range of postoperative study records was 6 months to 12.7 years. Results: The short-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 1.5% and 32.7%, for miniplates between 1.5% and 18.0%, and for bioresorbable bicortical screws between 10.4% and 17.4%, at point B. The long-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 2.0% and 50.3%, and for miniplates between 1.5% and 8.9%, at point B. Conclusions: BSSO for mandibular advancement is a good treatment option for skeletal Class 11, but seems less stable than BSSO setback in the short and long terms. Bicortical screws of titanium, stainless steel, or bioresorbable material show little difference regarding skeletal stability compared with miniplates in the short term. A greater number of studies with larger skeletal long-term relapse rates were evident in patients treated with bicortical screws instead of miniplates. The etiology of relapse is multifactorial, involving the proper seating of the condyles, the amount of advancement, the soft tissue and muscles, the mandibular plane angle, the remaining growth and remodeling, the skill of the Surgeon, and preoperative age. Patients with a low mandibular plane angle have increased vertical relapse, whereas patients with a high mandibular plane angle have more horizontal relapse. Advancements in the range of 6 to 7 mm or more predispose to horizontal relapse. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, further short-term and long-term research into BSSO advancement with rigid internal fixation should exclude additional Surgery, ie, genioplasty or maxillary Surgery, and include a prospective Study or randomized clinical trial design with correlation statistics. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 313
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy setback surgery with rigid internal fixation: A systematic review
    Joss, Christof Urs
    Vassalli, Isabella Maria
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (08) : 1634 - 1643
  • [2] Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy With Rigid Internal Fixation in Surgery-First Approach
    Kwon, Young-Wook
    Bayome, Mohamed
    Park, Je Uk
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (04) : 828.e1 - 828.e6
  • [4] Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement
    Loureiro Sato, Fabio Ricardo
    Asprino, Luciana
    Fernandes Moreira, Roger William
    de Moraes, Marcio
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) : E224 - E229
  • [5] SKELETAL STABILITY FOLLOWING MINIPLATE FIXATION AFTER BILATERAL SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY FOR MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT
    ABELOOS, J
    DECLERCQ, C
    NEYT, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (04) : 366 - 369
  • [6] Skeletal Stability after Bilateral Sagittal Split Advancement and Setback Osteotomy of the Mandible with Miniplate Fixation
    Rao, Srinivasan Hanumantha
    Selvaraj, Loganathan
    Lankupalli, Arathy S.
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2014, 7 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [7] Technical factors accounting for stability of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement - Wire osteosynthesis versus rigid fixation
    Van Sickels, JE
    Dolce, C
    Keeling, S
    Tiner, BD
    Clark, GM
    Rugh, JD
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2000, 89 (01): : 19 - 23
  • [8] Biomechanical stability analysis of rigid intraoral fixation for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Lee Ming-Yih
    Lin Chun-Li
    Tsai Wen-Da
    Lo Lun-Jou
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (03): : 451 - 455
  • [9] The study of stability of absorbable internal fixation after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramal osteotomy
    Choi, Byoung-Hwan
    Park, Su-Won
    Jang, Soo-Mi
    Son, Han-Na
    Park, Bong-Chan
    Son, Jang-Ho
    Cho, Yeong-Cheol
    Sung, Iel-Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2010, 36 (04) : 255 - 261
  • [10] NEUROSENSORY DISTURBANCE WITH RIGID FIXATION OF THE BILATERAL SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    NISHIOKA, GJ
    ZYSSET, MK
    VANSICKELS, JE
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1987, 45 (01) : 20 - 26