Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Contralesional Motor Cortex for Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

被引:33
|
作者
Kim, Won-Seok [1 ]
Kwon, Bum Sun [2 ]
Seo, Han Gil [3 ]
Park, Jihong [1 ]
Paik, Nam-Jong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Coll Med, 82,Gumi Ro 173 Beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation; rehabilitation; motor cortex; recovery of function; neuronal plasticity; UPPER-LIMB HEMIPARESIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; EARLY PHASE; BLOCK TEST; EXCITABILITY; RTMS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; BRAIN; NEUROREHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1177/1545968320948610
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the contralesional motor cortex (M1) has demonstrated beneficial effects on motor recovery, but evidence among patients with subacute stroke is lacking. We aimed to investigate whether 1-Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 versus sham rTMS could improve arm function in patients with subacute ischemic stroke when combined with rehabilitative motor training. Methods In total, 77 patients who were within 90 days after their first-ever ischemic stroke were enrolled and randomly allocated to either real (n = 40) or sham rTMS (n = 37). We delivered 1-Hz 30-minute active or sham rTMS before each daily 30-minute occupational therapy sessions over a 2-week period. The primary endpoint was changes in the Box and Block Test (BBT) score immediately after the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary analyses assessed changes in Fugl-Meyer assessment, Finger Tapping Test (FTT), Brunnstrom stage, and grip strength. Results Changes in BBT immediately after the end of treatment did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P= .267). Subgroup analysis according to cortical involvement revealed that real rTMS resulted in improvements in BBT at 1 month after EOT (17.4 +/- 9.8 real vs 10.9 +/- 10.3 sham;P= .023) and Brunnstrom stage of the hand immediately after EOT (0.6 +/- 0.5 real vs 0.2 +/- 0.5 sham;P= .023), only in the group without cortical involvement. Conclusion The effects of real and sham rTMS did not differ significantly among patients within 3 months poststroke. The location of stroke lesions should be considered for future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 867
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke The NICHE Trial
    Harvey, Richard L.
    Edwards, Dylan
    Dunning, Kari
    Fregni, Felipe
    Stein, Joel
    Laine, Jarmo
    Rogers, Lynn M.
    Vox, Ford
    Durand-Sanchez, Ana
    Bockbrader, Marcia
    Goldstein, Larry B.
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    Kinney, Carolyn L.
    Liu, Charles Y.
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (09) : 2138 - 2146
  • [2] Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex on motor recovery in severe hemiplegic stroke: A randomized clinical trial
    Wang, Qi
    Zhang, Dai
    Zhao, Ying-Yu
    Hai, Hong
    Ma, Yue-Wen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (04) : 979 - 986
  • [3] Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke
    Bashir, Shahid
    Vernet, Marine
    Najib, Umer
    Perez, Jennifer
    Alonso-Alonso, Miguel
    Knobel, Mark
    Yoo, Woo-Kyoung
    Edwards, Dylan
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 34 (04) : 677 - 689
  • [4] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial
    Du, J.
    Tian, L.
    Liu, W.
    Hu, J.
    Xu, G.
    Ma, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ye, R.
    Jiang, Y.
    Yin, Q.
    Zhu, W.
    Xiong, Y.
    Yang, F.
    Liu, X.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 23 (11) : 1666 - 1672
  • [5] Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with different motor evoked potential status: a randomized controlled trial
    Qian, Wenjun
    Liao, Xiaoyu
    Ju, Xiaowen
    Gao, Yaxin
    Wu, Miao
    Xie, Chen
    Zhang, Yaoying
    Long, Xianming
    Qian, Surong
    Gong, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [6] Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with motor deficits after brain tumor resection: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    Engelhardt, Melina
    Schneider, Heike
    Reuther, Jan
    Grittner, Ulrike
    Vajkoczy, Peter
    Picht, Thomas
    Rosenstock, Tizian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [7] Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke
    Nowak, Dennis A.
    Grefkes, Christian
    Dafotakis, Manuel
    Eickhoff, Simon
    Kuest, Jutta
    Karbe, Hans
    Fink, Gereon R.
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 65 (06) : 741 - 747
  • [9] Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial
    Liepert, Joachim
    Zittel, Simone
    Weiller, Cornelius
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 25 (5-6) : 461 - 465
  • [10] Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery and functional outcomes in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Askin, Ayhan
    Tosun, Aliye
    Demirdal, Umit Secil
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2017, 34 (02): : 102 - 107