Neuroendocrine liver metastases: Value of apparent diffusion coefficient and enhancement ratios for characterization of histopathologic grade

被引:20
|
作者
Besa, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Ward, Stephen [3 ]
Cui, Yong [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Jajamovich, Guido [1 ]
Kim, Michelle [6 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Translat & Mol Imaging Inst, One Gustave Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Body MRI, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Peking Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
neuroendocrine tumors; diffusion weighted imaging; contrast enhancement; magnetic resonance imaging; PANCREATIC ENDOCRINE TUMORS; FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS; WEIGHTED MRI; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CT; PREDICTION; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA; PATTERN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25320
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo assess the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and enhancement ratios (ER) measured with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) for the characterization of histopathologic tumor grade of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM). Materials and MethodsTwenty-two patients with pathology-proven NETLM and pretreatment 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI including DWI were included in this Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study. ADC histogram parameters, including mean, minimum (min), skewness, and kurtosis as well as ER, were computed for all lesions. Tumor grading was based on the World Health Organization 2010 classification. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test were used to assess for differences in ADC and ER between different tumor grades. MRI parameters were correlated with pathologic findings using Spearman correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine optimum thresholds for predicting tumor grade. ResultsForty-eight NETLM (mean size 3.5cm) were analyzed with the following grade distribution: G1 (n=25), G2 (n=16), and G3 (n=7). ADC-mean (x10(-3) mm(2)/s) of G3 tumors (0.870.43) was significantly lower than that of G1 (1.47 +/- 0.63) and G2 (1.27 +/- 0.63; P=0.042). A weak significant negative correlation was observed between ADC and tumor grade (ADC-mean: r=-0.33, P=0.02; ADC-min: r=-0.37, P=0.01) and Ki-67 (ADC-mean: r=-0.31, P=0.03; ADC-min: r=-0.39, P=0.007). AUROC, sensitivity and specificity of ADC-mean/ADC-min/ER (measured at the early arterial phase) for differentiation of G3 versus G1-G2 were 0.80/0.76/0.67, 100%/50%/70%, and 68.4%/84.2%/66.6%, respectively. ConclusionADC is a promising marker for characterization of histopathologic grade of NETLM. These results should be confirmed in a prospective study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1432-1441.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1441
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases
    Gultekin, Mehmet Ali
    Turk, Hac Mehmet
    Yurtsever, Ismail
    Cesme, Dilek Hacer
    Seker, Mesut
    Besiroglu, Mehmet
    Alkan, Alpay
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 : S81 - S86
  • [2] Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value on MRI and Histopathologic WHO Grades of Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Mebis, Wouter
    Snoeckx, Annemiek
    Corthouts, Bob
    El Addouli, Haroun
    Nicolay, Simon
    Van Hoyweghen, Astrid
    Spinhoven, Maarten
    Op de Beeck, Bart
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 104 (01):
  • [3] Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases
    Caravan, Ionut
    Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta
    Contis, Alexandra
    Lebovici, Andrei
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (05) : 599 - 605
  • [4] Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
    Chen, Jian
    Ma, Ning
    Sun, Mingyao
    Chen, Li
    Yao, Qimin
    Chen, XingFa
    Lin, Cuibo
    Lu, Yongwei
    Lin, Yingtao
    Lin, Liang
    Fan, Xuexiong
    Chen, Yiyu
    Wu, Jingjing
    He, Haixin
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [5] Solid focal liver lesion characterisation with apparent diffusion coefficient ratios
    Sutherland, Tom
    Steele, Emma
    van Tonder, Frans
    Yap, Kelvin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 58 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [6] Value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for quantification of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy
    Sugimoto, Ryosuke
    Iwasa, Motoh
    Maeda, Masayuki
    Urawa, Naohito
    Tanaka, Hideaki
    Fujita, Naoki
    Kobayashi, Yoshinao
    Takeda, Kan
    Kaito, Masahiko
    Takei, Yoshiyuki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (06): : 1413 - 1420
  • [7] Vertebral metastases: Assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient
    Herneth, AM
    Philipp, MO
    Naude, J
    Funovics, M
    Beichel, RR
    Bammer, R
    Imhof, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 889 - 894
  • [8] Associations Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value With Pathological Type, Histologic Grade, and Presence of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Carcinoma
    Wang, Yating
    Bai, Genji
    Guo, Lili
    Chen, Wei
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2019, 18 : 1 - 8
  • [9] Value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for estimating histological grade of vesical urothelial carcinoma
    Wang, H. J.
    Pui, M. H.
    Guo, Y.
    Li, S. R.
    Liu, M. J.
    Guan, J.
    Zhang, X. L.
    Feng, Y.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 69 (07) : 727 - 731
  • [10] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Response to Chemotherapy of Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer
    Drewes, Ralph
    Pech, Maciej
    Powerski, Maciej
    Omari, Jazan
    Heinze, Constanze
    Damm, Robert
    Wienke, Andreas
    Surov, Alexey
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 : S73 - S80