An Exploratory Analysis of the On-line Dispute Resolution Mechanism

被引:0
|
作者
Sidiropoulou, Panagiota-Aikaterina [1 ]
Moustakas, Evangelos [1 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, London N17 8HR, England
关键词
E-government; Online Dispute Resolution; ODR; e-resolution; e-commerce;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The 21st century is being characterized as the century of evolution for information technology, communication technology, electronic communications. Contemporary society does business through Internet, the forthcoming 'dispute resolution space' (Katsh and Rifkin 2001), people buy and sell regularly and even a large number of corporations have existence via an Internet address. This excitement for further improvement of dispute techniques, in relation to the exploitation of those technologies used for the management of online virtual communication led to the appearance of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism. The choice for settlement of disputes through the modern mechanism provides an easement for interested parties to tackle their disputes from any place and at any time through e-mails, video conferencing and chartrooms, instead of being in courtrooms. The fact that the businesses are done on net causes fear, regarding the security of personal data and business secrets in combination with the lack of a framework that could have supported such scheme. For that reason, the role of Government is taken into consideration in the accreditation of service providers, as well as in the settlement of e-administrative disputes and the securing of e-transactions in general. The necessity for self-regulation, equality of digital divide and government's recommendation for ODR tools is discussed. The current paper is useful for its collection of references and bibliography, for its characterisations of the various approaches and for its insights into various approaches. The current research describes a study that is undertaken in order to identify and explore considerable notions, concepts and debates for moving towards the development of an international dispute resolution framework on-line and trustful mechanism internationally.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 412
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Human Face of On-line Dispute Resolution
    Tyler, Melissa Conley
    Raines, Susan S.
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION QUARTERLY, 2006, 23 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [2] Accreditation of On-line Dispute Resolution Practitioners
    Tyler, Melissa Conley
    Bornstein, Jackie
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION QUARTERLY, 2006, 23 (03) : 383 - 404
  • [3] Exploratory analysis of an on-line evolutionary algorithm in simulated robots
    Haasdijk, Evert
    Smit, S. K.
    Eiben, A. E.
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 5 (04) : 213 - 230
  • [4] Exploratory analysis of an on-line evolutionary algorithm in simulated robots
    Evert Haasdijk
    S. K. Smit
    A. E. Eiben
    Evolutionary Intelligence, 2012, 5 (4) : 213 - 230
  • [6] From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution: towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China
    Wang, Zhiqiong June
    Chen, Jianfu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT, 2020, 16 (02) : 165 - 180
  • [7] Exploratory analysis of a sooting premixed flame via on-line high resolution (APi-TOF) mass spectrometry
    Carbone, Francesco
    Canagaratna, Manjula R.
    Lambe, Andrew T.
    Jayne, John T.
    Worsnop, Douglas R.
    Gomez, Alessandro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2019, 37 (01) : 919 - 926
  • [8] Progression Analysis of the EJCDC's Underlying Claim and Dispute Resolution Mechanism
    Barakat, Mohammad
    Khoury, Hiam
    Abdul-Malak, Mohamed-Asem
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 10 (03)
  • [9] ALTERNATIVE FINANCIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISM IN AUSTRALIA
    Yakovlev, Dmitry, V
    Kripakova, Dina R.
    Barkalova, Galina, I
    Solovykh, Svetlana H.
    Didenko, Kseniya, V
    TURISMO-ESTUDOS E PRATICAS, 2020,
  • [10] Quantitative legal prediction as a dispute resolution mechanism
    Van Der Haegen, Matthias
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW, 2023, 31 (2-3): : 299 - 328