Comparison of refilling schemes in the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method

被引:2
|
作者
Schwarzmeier, Christoph [1 ]
Ruede, Ulrich [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Syst Simulat, Cauerstrasse 11, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] CERFACS, 42 Ave Gaspard Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse 1, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
GRADS APPROXIMATION; FLUID; SIMULATIONS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1063/5.0131159
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Simulating mobile liquid-gas interfaces with the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method (FSLBM) requires frequent re-initialization of fluid flow information in computational cells that convert from gas to liquid. The corresponding algorithm, here referred to as the refilling scheme, is crucial for the successful application of the FSLBM in terms of accuracy and numerical stability. This study compares five refilling schemes that extract information from the surrounding liquid and interface cells by averaging, extrapolating, or assuming one of the three different equilibrium states. Six numerical experiments were performed, covering a broad spectrum of possible scenarios. These include a standing gravity wave, a rectangular and cylindrical dam break, a Taylor bubble, a drop impact into liquid, and a bubbly plane Poiseuille flow. In some simulations, the averaging, extrapolation, and one equilibrium-based scheme were numerically unstable. Overall, the results have shown that the simplest equilibrium-based scheme should be preferred in terms of numerical stability, computational cost, accuracy, and ease of implementation. (c) 2022 Author(s).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydraulics application of the Free-surface Lattice Boltzmann method
    Badarch, Ayurzana
    Tokuzo, Hosoyamada
    Narantsogt, Nasanbayar
    2016 11TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY (IFOST), PTS 1 AND 2, 2016,
  • [2] Analysis and comparison of boundary condition variants in the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method
    Schwarzmeier, Christoph
    Ruede, Ulrich
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2023, 95 (05) : 820 - 850
  • [3] Progress on simulating nonlinear free-surface flows with Lattice Boltzmann method
    Chu, Xuesen
    Han, Wenji
    Zhang, Ke
    Yan, Kai
    Proceedings of the Second Conference of Global Chinese Scholars on Hydrodynamics (CCSH'2016), Vols 1 & 2, 2016, : 380 - 385
  • [4] Comparison of free-surface and conservative Allen-Cahn phase-field lattice Boltzmann method
    Schwarzmeier, Christoph
    Holzer, Markus
    Mitchell, Travis
    Lehmann, Moritz
    Hausl, Fabian
    Rude, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 473
  • [5] Coupling of lattice Boltzmann shallow water model with lattice Boltzmann free-surface model
    Thorimbert, Yann
    Laett, Jonas
    Chopard, Bastien
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 33 : 1 - 10
  • [6] A regularized single-phase lattice Boltzmann method for free-surface flows
    Cao, Wenjin
    Li, Zhe
    Li, Xuhui
    Le Touze, David
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 80 (10) : 2194 - 2211
  • [7] Free-surface flow simulations with floating objects using lattice Boltzmann method
    Watanabe, Seiya
    Kawahara, Jun
    Aoki, Takayuki
    Sugihara, Kenta
    Takase, Shinsuke
    Moriguchi, Shuji
    Hashimoto, Hirotada
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [8] A coupled lattice Boltzmann and particle level set method for free-surface flows
    Yu, Yang
    Chen, Li
    Lu, Jianhua
    Hou, Guoxiang
    SCIENCEASIA, 2014, 40 (03): : 238 - 247
  • [9] Simulation of free-surface flows using the Lattice Boltzmann method with the AMR technique
    Liu, Zhengliang
    Feng, Xingya
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2023, 237 (11) : 2498 - 2506
  • [10] An improved surface tension and wall adhesion model for free-surface flows in the lattice Boltzmann method
    Yu, Yang
    Chen, Li
    Lu, Jianhua
    Hou, Guoxiang
    International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 2013, 46 (16): : 324 - 340