Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students' approaches to learning

被引:21
|
作者
Kyndt, Eva [1 ]
Cascallar, Eduardo [1 ]
Dochy, Filip [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Res Profess Learning & Dev, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Working memory capacity; Attention; Approaches to learning; Higher education; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; SELF-EFFICACY; SPAN; ENVIRONMENTS; INTELLIGENCE; PERCEPTIONS; PERSONALITY; ASSESSMENTS; PREDICTORS; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-011-9493-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Past research has shown that working memory capacity, attention and students' approaches to learning are all important predictors for educational achievement. In this study the interrelations between these three variables are investigated. Participants were 128 university students. Results show a negative relationship between attention and deep approaches to learning: students with a lower level of attention seem to use more deep approaches to learning than students with higher levels of attention. It was also found that students with a high working memory capacity score lower on both the surface and deep approaches to learning than students with a low working memory capacity. A possible explanation is that these high capacity students might not need a consistent profound strategy to be successful because they are very good at acquiring, processing and integrating all types of new information before moving it to storage.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 297
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students’ approaches to learning
    Eva Kyndt
    Eduardo Cascallar
    Filip Dochy
    Higher Education, 2012, 64 : 285 - 297
  • [2] Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation
    Bleckley, MK
    Durso, FT
    Crutchfield, JM
    Engle, RW
    Khanna, MM
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) : 884 - 889
  • [3] Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation
    M. Kathryn Bleckley
    Francis T. Durso
    Jerry M. Crutchfield
    Randall W. Engle
    Maya M. Khanna
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 884 - 889
  • [4] Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening
    Gregory J. H. Colflesh
    Andrew R. A. Conway
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 699 - 703
  • [5] Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening
    Colflesh, Gregory J. H.
    Conway, Andrew R. A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) : 699 - 703
  • [6] Verbatim and gist memory and individual differences in inhibition, sustained attention, and working memory capacity
    Nieznanski, Marek
    Obidzinski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 31 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [7] Individual differences in anxiety and fear learning: The role of working memory capacity
    Laing, Patrick A. F.
    Burns, Nicholas
    Baetu, Irina
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2019, 193 : 42 - 54
  • [8] Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity
    Antonios I. Christou
    R. Chris Miall
    Fiona McNab
    Joseph M. Galea
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [9] Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity
    Christou, Antonios I.
    Miall, R. Chris
    McNab, Fiona
    Galea, Joseph M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [10] Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity
    Yu, Ju-Chi
    Chang, Ting-Yun
    Yang, Cheng-Ta
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5