Who and What Really Matters to the Firm: Moving Stakeholder Salience beyond Managerial Perceptions

被引:63
|
作者
Tashman, Pete [1 ]
Raelin, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Business Adm, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
stakeholder salience; stakeholder-agency theory; market frictions; stakeholder dialogue; convergent stakeholder theory; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; DISCOURSE ETHICS; LEGITIMACY; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; CONCEPTION; DIALOGUE; CONDUCT; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.5840/beq201323441
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We develop the concept of stakeholder salience to account for stake-holders who should matter to the firm, even when managers do not perceive them as important. While managers are responsible for attributing salience to stakeholders, they can overlook or ignore stakeholder importance because of market frictions that affect managerial perceptions or induce opportunism. When this happens, corporate financial and social performance can suffer. Thus, we propose that the perceptions of organizational and societal stakeholders should also codetermine the salience of the focal stakeholder to the firm. We also propose that stakeholder dialogue can reduce the impacts that market frictions can have on managerial perceptions of stakeholder interests that should matter to the firm. Finally, we discuss how the refined conceptualization of stakeholder salience might have better predictive validity, be more normative, and make instrumental and normative stakeholder theory more convergent.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 616
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience in mining
    Viveros, Hector
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 3 (04): : 987 - 996
  • [2] Stakeholder salience and engagement in political organisations Who and what really counts?
    O'Higgins, Eleanor R. E.
    Morgan, Joseph W.
    SOCIETY AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 1 (01) : 62 - 76
  • [3] Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts
    Mitchell, RK
    Agle, BR
    Wood, DJ
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04): : 853 - 886
  • [4] Who and What Really Count? An Examination of Stakeholder Salience in Not-for-Profit Service Delivery Organizations
    Chen, Jinhua
    Harrison, Graeme
    Jiao, Lu
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 77 (04) : 813 - 828
  • [5] Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review
    Joos H.C.
    Management Review Quarterly, 2019, 69 (1) : 3 - 37
  • [6] Stakeholder Representation and Salience: A Discussion of "Who or What Really Counts" Based on the Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports
    Staicu, Anca-Monica
    VISION 2020: INNOVATION, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOLS 1-3, 2013, : 1219 - 1231
  • [7] Who Really Counts? Organizational Life Cycle and Environmental Stakeholder's Salience
    Gong Hongbin
    HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY ERA, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1063 - 1068
  • [8] Measuring What Matters:Moving Beyond GDP
    JAMES BRENDAN BOLGER
    China Today, 2019, (05) : 14 - 16
  • [9] Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters?
    Bennouri, Moez
    Chtioui, Tawhid
    Nagati, Haithem
    Nekhili, Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 88 : 267 - 291
  • [10] Going beyond health efficiency: What really matters?
    Radojicic, Milan
    Jeremic, Veljko
    Savic, Gordana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 35 (01): : 318 - 338