History and Philosophy of Science versus Science and Technology Studies Olga E. Stoliarova

被引:0
|
作者
Stoliarova, Olga E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RAS, Inst Philosophy, Dept Social Epistemol, Moscow, Russia
[2] Russian Presidential Acad Natl Econ & Publ Adm RA, Inst Social Sci, Dept Theoret Sociol & Epistemol, Philosophy & Sociol Fac, Moscow, Russia
关键词
science and technology studies; historical epistemology; philosophy of science; ontology; relativism; context of scientific knowledge; post-positivism; naturalism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The article is devoted to the post-positivist programs of history and philosophy of science and science and technology studies. A comparative analysis of these programs is related to one of the key problems in current post-positivist research that has been identified as a "problem of context". It is well known that post-positivist science studies historicize epistemology and, thus, subordinate the "context of justification" to the "context of discovery". However the various and often contradictory interpretations of Reichenbach's distinction force us to rethink theoretical assumptions, ontological premises and methodological principles of post-positivist approaches and reevaluate the role of philosophy and philosophical ontology in social constructivism, naturalism and relativism which are recognized as the hallmarks of contemporary science studies.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 83
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条