Performance Differences Between Conventional Smears and Liquid-Based Preparations of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Samples Analysis of 47 076 Responses in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology

被引:27
|
作者
Fischer, Andrew H. [1 ]
Clayton, Amy C. [2 ]
Bentz, Joel S. [3 ]
Wasserman, Patricia G. [4 ]
Henry, Michael R. [2 ]
Souers, Rhona J. [5 ]
Moriarty, Ann T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Cytopathol, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Anat Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Lab Med Consultants Ltd, Dept Pathol, Las Vegas, NV USA
[4] N Shore Long Isl Jewish Hlth Syst, Dept Anat Pathol Serv, New Hyde Pk, NY USA
[5] Coll Amer Pathologists, Dept Stat & Biostat, Northfield, IL USA
[6] AmeriPath Indiana, Dept Pathol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
THINPREP(R) TECHNIQUE; FOLLICULAR NEOPLASMS; COLLOID NODULES; DISTINCTION; ARTIFACTS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-Controversy exists about whether thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) should be processed with conventional smears or liquid-based preparations (LBPs). Objective.-To compare the performance of conventional smears to LBPs for thyroid FNA slides circulated in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology. Design.-Participant responses for thyroid FNA slides were compared with the reference diagnosis at the level of 3 general diagnostic categories: negative, suspicious (which included only follicular and Hurthle cell neoplasm), and malignant. For specific reference diagnoses of benign/goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma, the participants' specific diagnoses were analyzed and poorly performing slides were rereviewed. Results.-The 47 076 thyroid FNA slide responses, between 2001 and 2009, included 44 478 responses (94%) for conventional smears and 2598 responses (6%) for LBPs. For the general reference category negative, participant responses were discrepant in 14.9% of conventional smears compared with 5.9% for LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of benign/goiter was misdiagnosed as a follicular neoplasm in 7.8% of conventional smears, compared with 1.3% of LBP. For the general reference category of malignant, participant responses were discrepant in 7.3% of conventional smears compared with 14.7% of LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma was misdiagnosed as benign/goiter in 7.2% of LBPs, compared with 4.8% of conventional smears (p < .001). Conclusions.-LBPs performed worse than conventional smears for cases with a reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, LBPs performed better than conventional smears for cases with a benign reference diagnosis. Specific features in thyroid FNAs that may improve the diagnostic accuracy of LBPs and conventional smears are described. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137:26-31; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP)
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Performance of Direct Smears Compared to Liquid-Based Preparations of Thyroid FNA Samples: Analysis of 47,076 Responses in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology
    Fischer, Andrew
    Clayton, Amy
    Bentz, Joel
    Wasserman, Patricia
    Henry, Michael
    Souers, Rhona
    Nayar, Ritu
    Moriarty, Ann
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (05) : 307 - 308
  • [2] Cytomorphological Differences between Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smears in Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Lesions
    Sharma, Shuchita
    Agarwal, Shilpi
    Jain, Manjula
    Singh, Gautam Bir
    Andley, Manoj
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2018, 35 (04) : 208 - 211
  • [3] Misinterpretation of normal cellular elements in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens - Observations from the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology
    Young, NA
    Mody, DR
    Davey, DD
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 126 (06) : 670 - 675
  • [4] Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples
    Arul, P.
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) : 177 - 181
  • [5] A Comparative Analysis of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smears in Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Lesions
    Maurya, Malti K.
    Yadav, Rita
    Kumar, Madhu
    Singh, Hitendra P.
    Mishra, Anand
    Goel, Madhu Mati
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [6] How Do Liquid-Based Preparations of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Compare with Conventional Smears? An Analysis of 5475 Specimens
    Nagarajan, Neeraja
    Schneider, Eric B.
    Ali, Syed Z.
    Zeiger, Martha A.
    Olson, Matthew T.
    THYROID, 2015, 25 (03) : 308 - 313
  • [7] Pitfalls in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cytology - Lessons from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology
    Hughes, JH
    Volk, EE
    Wilbur, DC
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 129 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [8] THE ANALYSIS OF 3,054 LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY IN THYROID FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION: COMPARISON WITH 968 CONVENTIONAL SMEARS
    Kim, I.
    Lee, J. H.
    Ahn, H. K.
    Chae, Y. S.
    Yeom, B. W.
    Won, N. H.
    Choi, J. S.
    Kim, C.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2010, 54 (03) : 403 - 404
  • [9] Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kang, Yun Jin
    Lee, Hyeon Woo
    Stybayeva, Gulnaz
    Hwang, Se Hwan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [10] The significance of certification in liquid-based cytology and performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    Mody, Dina R.
    Walsh, Molly
    Bentz, Joel S.
    Colgan, Terence J.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 130 (09) : 1269 - 1272