Unconventional Treatments of Food: Microwave vs. Radiofrequency

被引:17
|
作者
Stefanoiu, Georgiana-Aurora [1 ]
Tanase, Elisabeta Elena [1 ]
Mitelut, Amalia Carmen [1 ]
Popa, Mona Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agron Sci & Vet Med Bucharest, 59 Marasti Blvd,Dist 1, Bucharest 011464, Romania
关键词
food spoilage; microwave treatment; radiofrequency treatment; food preservation; INACTIVATION; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.09.024
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Food spoilage causes considerable economic losses and constitutes a health risk for consumers due to the potential for some microorganisms to produce toxins. In the last ten years, there are limitations in the microbial decontamination of foods by current methods and the development of novel techniques in this area would be advantageous. Conventional cooking and heating techniques produce the degradation of the product's quality attributes and nutritional properties due to the intense heat treatment and subsequent destruction of proteins and vitamins, including undesirable changes to other characteristics such as flavor and color. Dielectric heating has been studied in many experiments for microbial and pest reduction and for the ability to heat the product without making undesirable changes. The aim of this study is to make a short review in respect to unconventional treatments of food, which are already implemented in industry or are in the research and development phase. The paper presents similarities and differences between two novel treatments: microwave (MW) and radiofrequency (RF) in terms of equipment required, mechanism of action and applications in food industry. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 510
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Retrospective Comparison of Microwave Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Hepatic Metastases
    Correa-Gallego, Camilo
    Fong, Yuman
    Gonen, Mithat
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    Allen, Peter J.
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Kingham, T. Peter
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (13) : 4278 - 4283
  • [2] A Retrospective Comparison of Microwave Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Hepatic Metastases
    Camilo Correa-Gallego
    Yuman Fong
    Mithat Gonen
    Michael I. D’Angelica
    Peter J. Allen
    Ronald P. DeMatteo
    William R. Jarnagin
    T. Peter Kingham
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 4278 - 4283
  • [3] Food vs. wildlife
    Johnson, D
    FUTURIST, 1998, 32 (03) : 8 - 8
  • [4] Ethanol vs. food
    Moyer, Donald
    FORTUNE, 2008, 157 (12) : 10 - 10
  • [5] A comparison study of microwave ablation vs. histotripsy for focal liver treatments in a swine model
    Knott, Emily A.
    Zlevor, Annie M.
    Hinshaw, J. Louis
    Laeseke, Paul F.
    Longhurst, Colin
    Frank, Jenifer
    Bradley, Charles W.
    Couillard, Allison B.
    Rossebo, Annika E.
    Xu, Zhen
    Lee, Fred T., Jr.
    Ziemlewicz, Timothy J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (02) : 1050 - 1062
  • [6] A comparison study of microwave ablation vs. histotripsy for focal liver treatments in a swine model
    Emily A. Knott
    Annie M. Zlevor
    J. Louis Hinshaw
    Paul F. Laeseke
    Colin Longhurst
    Jenifer Frank
    Charles W. Bradley
    Allison B. Couillard
    Annika E. Rossebo
    Zhen Xu
    Fred T. Lee
    Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 1050 - 1062
  • [7] Endovenous Laser Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation
    Krome, Susanne
    PHLEBOLOGIE, 2019, 48 (05) : 288 - 288
  • [8] Conventional treatments vs. gene therapy
    Hamblin, Terry
    SCIENTIST, 2006, 20 (07): : 15 - 15
  • [9] Radiofrequency ablation vs. microwave ablation for patients with benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score matching study
    Yue, Wen-Wen
    Wang, Shu-Rong
    Lu, Feng
    Sun, Li-Ping
    Guo, Le-Hang
    Zhang, Yong-Lin
    Li, Xiao-Long
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    ENDOCRINE, 2017, 55 (02) : 485 - 495
  • [10] Radiofrequency ablation vs. microwave ablation for patients with benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score matching study
    Wen-Wen Yue
    Shu-Rong Wang
    Feng Lu
    Li-Ping Sun
    Le-Hang Guo
    Yong-Lin Zhang
    Xiao-Long Li
    Hui-Xiong Xu
    Endocrine, 2017, 55 : 485 - 495