A Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Lowers Cost of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

被引:21
|
作者
Das Ghatak, Piya
Schlanger, Richard
Ganesh, Kasturi
Lambert, Lynn
Gordillo, Gayle M.
Martinsek, Patsy
Roy, Sashwati [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Comprehens Wound Ctr, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; TRAUMA; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1089/wound.2014.0615
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: To test whether the use of a wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) (Procellera (R)) in conjunction with a 5-day negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may reduce the number of dressing changes required per week with this therapy. Approach: At the Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, chronic wound patients (n = 30) undergoing NPWT were randomized into two arms following consent as approved by the institutional review board. The control arm received standard of care NPWT, where the dressing change was performed thrice a week. The test arm received the same care except that the WED was added as an interface layer and dressing change was limited to twice a week. Results: A reduced cost of care was achieved using the WED in conjunction with NPWT. Despite fewer dressing changes in wounds dressed with the WED, closure outcomes were comparable with no overt signs of any wound complication, including infection. The cost of NPWT care during the week was significantly lower (from $2918 to $2346) in the WED-treated group compared with patients in the control arm. Innovation: This work introduces a novel technology platform involving a WED, which may be used in conjunction with NPWT. If used as such, NPWT is effective in decreasing the frequency of dressing change and lowering the cost of care. Conclusion: This work points toward the benefit of using the WED combined with NPWT. A larger clinical trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of WED in wound care is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 311
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjuvant dressing for negative pressure wound therapy in burns
    Terrazas, SG
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 52 (01) : 16 - +
  • [2] Ketoconazole resistant Candida albicans is sensitive to a wireless electroceutical wound care dressing
    Khona, Dolly K.
    Roy, Sashwati
    Ghatak, Subhadip
    Huang, Kaixiang
    Jagdale, Gargi
    Baker, Lane A.
    Sen, Chandan K.
    BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2021, 142
  • [3] A genomic evaluation of novel negative pressure wound therapy dressing
    Derrick, Kathleen
    Schmidt, Marisa
    Robinson, Tim
    Locke, Chris
    Kieswetter, Kris
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2020, 28 : S58 - S59
  • [4] Silicone net dressing as an adjunct with negative pressure wound therapy
    Dunbar, A
    Bowers, DM
    Holderness, H
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 51 (04) : 18 - +
  • [5] A Hydroconductive Dressing as a Potential Alternative to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    Scott, Ronald G.
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 58 (05) : 10 - 10
  • [6] Low-cost topical negative pressure wound dressing system
    Gnanaraj, J.
    TROPICAL DOCTOR, 2010, 40 (04) : 208 - 209
  • [7] A Novel Bioresorbable/Biointegratable/Biocompatible Dressing for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    Cindass, Renford, Jr.
    Wu, Kevin Y.
    Lawson, Sharon D.
    Gorantla, Vijay S.
    Davis, Michael R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 91 - 91
  • [8] Cost Implications of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Review
    Bourke, M. H.
    Healy, D. G.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 181 : S94 - S95
  • [9] A WIRELESS ELECTROCEUTICAL WOUND DRESSING DISRUPTS MIXED SPECIES BACTERIAL BIOFILM IN A PORCINE PRECLINICAL MODEL
    Ganesh, K.
    Roy, S.
    Dixit, S.
    Vanzant, D.
    Ghatak, P.
    Mathew, S.
    Schwab, E.
    Joseph, M.
    Lambert, L.
    Sen, C. K.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2015, 23 (02) : A22 - A22
  • [10] Clinical experience with the negative pressure wound dressing
    Avery, C
    Pereira, J
    Moody, A
    Whitworth, I
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 38 (04): : 343 - 345