Criteria and markers for protein quality assessment - a review

被引:75
|
作者
Tome, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] AgroParisTech, Dept Life Sci & Hlth, UMR Nutr Physiol & Ingest Behav 914, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; RICE-HYDROLYSATE FORMULA; ISOLATED SOY PROTEIN; DIETARY-PROTEIN; NITROGEN-BALANCE; AMINO-ACID; COWS MILK; YOUNG MEN; BODY-COMPOSITION; HIP FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1017/S0007114512002565
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Dietary proteins are found in animal products, plant products and single-cell organisms. Proteins are present in variable proportions in these different food sources and the different proteins also differ in their amino acid composition, dietary indispensable amino acid content and physico-chemical properties. Different criteria can be used to define dietary protein requirements and different markers can be used to assess nutritional protein quality according to the criteria used for protein requirement estimation. The current approach to determining protein requirements is related to nitrogen balance and the dietary indispensable amino acid score approach relates protein quality to the capacity of protein to allow reaching nitrogen balance by providing nitrogen and indispensable amino acids. A second approach considers more directly protein nitrogen utilization by the body and includes measurement of protein digestibility and of the efficiency of dietary nitrogen retention at maintenance or for protein deposition at the whole body level or in more specific body areas. Another approach is related to protein turnover and protein synthesis in relation to maintenance and/or efficiency for deposition or development (growth) at the whole body level or for different and more specific target tissues such as muscle or bone. Lastly, protein quality can also be evaluated from different markers used as risk factors for metabolic dysfunction and disorders related for instance to insulin resistance, diabetes and obesity or cardio-vascular disease. The accuracy and relevance of these different approaches is discussed regarding the capacity of the different protein sources (i.e. animal as meat, milk or eggs, legume as soya or pea, or cereal as wheat or rice) to satisfy protein requirements according to these different criteria and markers.
引用
收藏
页码:S222 / S229
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT OF REVIEW CRITERIA - LINKING GUIDELINES AND ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY
    BAKER, R
    FRASER, RC
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7001): : 370 - 373
  • [2] Nutritional and physiological criteria in the assessment of milk protein quality for humans
    Bos, C
    Gaudichon, C
    Tomé, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2000, 19 (02) : 191S - 205S
  • [3] An overview of the characteristics and quality assessment criteria in systematic review of pharmacoeconomics
    Chen, Min
    Mi, Xue
    Fei, Haotian
    Li, Jialian
    Zhang, Lingli
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [4] Criteria for quality assessment of a systematic review and/or meta-analysis
    Aledo, Victor Soria
    Carrillo-Alcaraz, Andres
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2024, 102 (11): : 609 - 611
  • [5] Markers for nutrition studies: review of criteria for the evaluation of markers
    Jan de Vries
    Jean-Michel Antoine
    Tomasz Burzykowski
    Alessandro Chiodini
    Mike Gibney
    Gunter Kuhnle
    Agnès Méheust
    Loek Pijls
    Ian Rowland
    European Journal of Nutrition, 2013, 52 : 1685 - 1699
  • [6] Markers for nutrition studies: review of criteria for the evaluation of markers
    de Vries, Jan
    Antoine, Jean-Michel
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    Chiodini, Alessandro
    Gibney, Mike
    Kuhnle, Gunter
    Meheust, Agnes
    Pijls, Loek
    Rowland, Ian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2013, 52 (07) : 1685 - 1699
  • [7] How to assess the quality of psychotherapy outcome studies: A systematic review of quality assessment criteria
    Liebherz, Sarah
    Schmidt, Nele
    Rabung, Sven
    PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (05) : 573 - 589
  • [8] RAPID METHODS OF PROTEIN-QUALITY ASSESSMENT - A REVIEW
    HEGER, J
    FRYDRYCH, Z
    BIOLOGIZACE A CHEMIZACE ZIVOCISNE VYROBY-VETERINARIA, 1980, 16 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [9] Innovative tools for quality assessment: integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs (ICROMS)
    Zingg, W.
    Castro-Sanchez, E.
    Secci, F. V.
    Edwards, R.
    Drumright, L. N.
    Sevdalis, N.
    Holmes, A. H.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 133 : 19 - 37
  • [10] Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review
    de Ruijter, Vera N.
    Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.
    Gouin, Todd
    Koelmans, Albert A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (19) : 11692 - 11705