RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF SPRING OPERATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE

被引:0
|
作者
Bao, Shiyi [1 ]
Li, Zhibin [1 ]
Luo, Lijia [1 ]
Gao, Zengliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Inst Proc Equipment & Control, Hangzhou 310032, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
PETRI NETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Pressure relief valve (PRV) is an important automatic over-pressure protection system in the process industry. Because of the operating characteristics, the performance of PRV is supposed to be proved by the proof test. However, it's difficult to determine the proof test intervals and the availability of the PRY between two proof tests. Based on stochastic Petri nets (SPN), the reliability modeling and analysis procedure of spring operated full lift pressure relief valve which is the most widely used PRY is depicted in this paper. Firstly, the FMECA method is used to analyze the causes and effects of the typical six failure modes of the PRY, such as vibration, leakage, frequency hopping, unable to open, open before the settings and the low back seat pressure. Second, the corresponding fault tree (FT) models of the PRY are built through the multi-component failure analysis. Third, the SPN models of the PRY are established by employing the logical relations in the FT models. Based on the collected failure data of the PRVs, the steady state and transient reliability index are calculated by Monte Carlo simulation based on the SPN software SPN@. Last, the idea about PRY reliability data collection in domestic process industries is proposed. The result of the reliability analysis can provide the basis for determination the proof test intervals of the PRY, and the proposed procedure also bears significance in its application in the reliability analysis of general system in process industry.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SPRING OPERATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS 2004 TO 2014
    Watson, Holly L.
    Gross, Robert E.
    Harris, Stephen P.
    ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2015, VOL 6B, 2015,
  • [2] Analysis of spring operated pressure relief valve proof test data: Findings and implications
    Bukowski, Julia V.
    Goble, William M.
    Gross, Robert E.
    Harris, Stephen P.
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2018, 37 (04) : 467 - 477
  • [3] Validation of Spring Operated Pressure Relief Valve Time-to-Failure
    Harris, Stephen P.
    Gross, Robert E.
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2010, 29 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [4] Dynamic analysis of pilot operated pressure relief valve
    Dasgupta, K
    Karmakar, R
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2002, 10 (1-2) : 35 - 49
  • [5] Reliability sensitivity analysis for set pressure tolerance of the direct-operated relief valve in a vibration environment
    Zha, Congyi
    Pan, Chenrong
    Sun, Zhili
    Liu, Qin
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 38 (09) : 4835 - 4845
  • [6] Failure analysis of spring of hydraulic operated valve
    Pal, Urbi
    Mukhopadhyay, Goutam
    Bhattacharya, Sandip
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2019, 95 : 191 - 198
  • [7] Orifice Design of a Pilot-Operated Pressure Relief Valve
    Jang, Sang Chan
    Kang, Jung Ho
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2017, 139 (03):
  • [8] THE EFFECTS OF MAINTENANCE ACTIONS ON THE PFDavg OF SPRING OPERATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES
    Bukowski, Julia V.
    Goble, William M.
    Gross, Robert E.
    Harris, Stephen R.
    ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 6B, 2014,
  • [9] FAILURE ASSESSMENT OF SPRING-OPERATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE PROOF TEST DATA FOR EXTENDING TIME-IN-SERVICE
    Bukowski, Julia, V
    Gross, Robert E.
    Harris, Stephen P.
    Goble, William M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 PRESSURE VESSELS & PIPING CONFERENCE (PVP2020), VOL 6, 2020,
  • [10] DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF SPRING-LOADED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE: NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
    Carneiro, Leonardo Motta
    Pires, Luis F. G.
    Cruz, Marcelo de Souza
    Azevedo, Luis F. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 1, 2013, : 553 - 561