Benchmarking the private sector banks in India using MCDM approach

被引:10
|
作者
Gupta, Sanjay [1 ]
Mathew, Manoj [2 ]
Gupta, Swati [1 ]
Dawar, Vinay [3 ]
机构
[1] Panjab Univ, Sri Aurobindo Coll Commerce & Management, Chandigarh, India
[2] SSIPMT, Dept Mech Engn, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Chandigarh Univ, Univ Sch Business, Ghruan, Mohali, India
关键词
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY AHP; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1002/pa.2409
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The study aims to rank the performance of Indian private sector banks on the basis of their financial capability. The study is focussed on those banks which are listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), for the period from 2014-15 to 2018-19. The financial performance of selected Indian private banks is ranked using a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique, that is, AHP-TOPSIS. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the weights of 10 financial performance pointers, and further Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used to provide rankings and benchmarking of the private sector banks. Thereafter, overall ranking is given to the selected banks using interval-valued TOPSIS (IV-TOPSIS) for a combined period of 5 years. Sensitivity analysis has been performed to check the robustness of the method and its impact on the final ranking of the banks. Results showed that HDFC bank is the top performer and is ranked first for all the years consecutively during the period 2014-2019 and has set a financial indicator benchmark for other competitor banks. South Indian Bank showed the worst results in each year and stood last in the overall ranking. The IndusInd bank is followed after HDFC bank by improving its performance from 2014-19. With a slight margin, Kotak Mahindra Bank ranked after IndusInd. Through the AHP-TOPSIS technique, each year the private sector banks ranking differs among themselves depending upon the financial performance pointers. Based on interval-valued TOPSIS (IV-TOPSIS), it was found that the overall HDFC was the top-performing bank and South Indian Bank was the worst-performing bank among all other banks. The results obtained from sensitivity analysis were found to be consistent with IV-TOPSIS. The paper used the AHP technique, which is subjective in nature, and the results depend on the opinion of the experts. This study will assist the investors who want to channelize their funds in private banks having shares enlisted in BSE. It will accommodate banks to compare and judge their financial performance along with improving their performance and planning their future strategy. AHP-TOPSIS utilized by past researchers is unable to bring out the cumulative performance for banks, but in this paper, IV-TOPSIS is utilized, which can be effectively used to evaluate the cumulative performance of banks. The study tries to fill the gap in the literature by providing the overall ranking to private sector banks in India on the basis of financial indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of ARAS and MOORA MCDM Techniques for Measuring the Performance of Private Sector Banks in India
    Rao, Sama Hamumantha
    Kalvakolanu, Sripathi
    Chakraborty, Chinmay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 29 (SUPPL 2) : 279 - 295
  • [2] Job satisfaction in private sector banks in India
    Ghosh, Piyali
    Singh, Tripti
    Mukherjee, Udita
    Tripathi, Neelohit Prakash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDIAN CULTURE AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 3 (05) : 560 - 576
  • [3] Fundamental Analysis of Selected Public and Private Sector Banks in India
    Sodhi, Amanjot Kaur
    Waraich, Simran
    NMIMS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 28 : 32 - 48
  • [4] PERFORMANCE OF PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIAL BANKS IN INDIA AFTER REFORMS
    Chopra, Shruti
    Toor, M. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 9 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [5] PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIAL BANKS IN INDIA: EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    Chopra, Shruti
    Toor, M. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 10 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [6] DETERMINANTS OF PROFITABILITY OF PUBLIC SECTOR AND PRIVATE SECTOR COMMERCIAL BANKS IN INDIA : 2017-18: A DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS APPROACH
    Subbarayan, A.
    Kumar, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 16 (01): : 335 - 342
  • [7] Assessment of service quality using text mining - evidence from private sector banks in India
    Chakrabarti, Somnath
    Trehan, Deepak
    Makhija, Mayank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2018, 36 (04) : 594 - 615
  • [8] Factors Affecting the Outsourcing Activities in Public and Private Sector Banks in India
    Rautela, Poonam
    Sarkar, Madhulika P.
    Goel, Rekha
    FIIB BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 13 (04) : 452 - 463
  • [9] ASSESSING CUSTOMERS' PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY IN PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA
    Panda, Rajeev Kumar
    Kondasani, Rama Koteswara Rao
    SERBIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 9 (01) : 91 - 103
  • [10] DETERMINANTS OF LIQUIDITY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA: 2009-2016 - A PANEL DATA APPROACH
    Subbarayan, A.
    Kumar, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 14 (02): : 817 - 824