Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy or botulinum toxin injection for management of esophageal achalasia - Patient choice and treatment outcomes

被引:29
|
作者
Andrews, CN [1 ]
Anvari, M [1 ]
Dobranowski, J [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Hosp, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
关键词
achalasia; botulinum toxin; esophagus; laparoscopic Heller's myotomy; outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s004649901090
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Esophageal achalasia is a rare disease in which degenerating parasympathetic innervation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) leads to unopposed sympathetic tone and failure to relax on deglutition, resulting in a range of symptoms for the patient, most notably dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss. Laparoscopic Heller's esophagomyotomy (Lap-HM) and botulinum toxin (BoTox) injection into the LES are two recently described methods for treating achalasia. No comparison of laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and botulinum toxin has yet been presented. Methods: A total of 22 patients (15 men, 7 women; mean age, 57.9 years) diagnosed with idiopathic esophageal achalasia were given a choice of treatment modality: Lap-HM or BoTox. Patients were prospectively assessed before and after treatment with esophageal manometry, barium swallow roentgenography, and dysphagia score. Patients' preferences and treatment efficacy were evaluated. Results: Of the 22 patients, 18 (81.8%) chose BoTox and 4 (18.2%) chose Lap-HM. Five patients in the BoTox group opted for Lap-HM a mean of 565 +/- 212 days after the first injection, having received a median of four (range, 3-5) injections. Both BoTox and Lap-HM were effective in improving dysphagia score: before BoTox (median, 7; range, 0-10) and 2 months afterward (median, 2; range, 0-6) (p < 0.01); before Lap-HM (median, 9; range, 7-10) and 6 months afterward (median, 1.5; range, 0-4) (p < 0.05). Bath methods also effectively reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) nadir pressure: before BoTox (mean mmHg, 22 +/- 9) and 2 months afterward (mean mmHg, 15 +/- 7) (p < 0.05); before Lap-HM (mean mmHg, 24 +/- 10) and 6 months afterward (mean mmHg, 3 +/- 4) (p < 0.05). However, only Lap-HM produced a significant reduction in LES basal pressure before (mean mmHg, 34 +/- 7) and afterward (mean mmHg, 3 +/- 3) (p < 0.01) and increased esophageal barium clearance (mean percentage of barium retained in esophagus at 5 min before (97% +/- 6%) and afterward (23% +/- 45%) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: BoTox injection and Lap-HM both significantly reduce achalasia symptoms, but only Lap-HM improves esophageal clearance of barium. BoTox injection is the most popular treatment method from a patient perspective, although symptom recurrence or failure rates are high. Lap-KM is favored by younger patients and is equally effective after BoTox therapy failure.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 746
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy or botulinum toxin injection for management of esophageal achalasia Patient choice and treatment outcomes
    C. N. Andrews
    M. Anvari
    J. Dobranowski
    Surgical Endoscopy, 1999, 13 : 742 - 746
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia
    Zaninotto, G
    Annese, V
    Costantini, M
    Del Genio, A
    Costantino, M
    Epifani, M
    Gatto, G
    D'onofrio, V
    Benini, L
    Contini, S
    Molena, D
    Battaglia, G
    Tardio, B
    Andriulli, A
    Ancona, E
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (03) : 364 - 370
  • [3] A previous treatment with botulinum toxin injections jeopardizes the final results of subsequent laparoscopic heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia
    Costantini, M
    Zaninotto, G
    Portale, G
    Guirroli, E
    Rizzetto, C
    Nicoletti, L
    Salvador, R
    Ceolin, M
    Ancona, E
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (04) : A802 - A803
  • [4] Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia
    Ibanez, Luis
    Butte, Jean Michel
    Pimentel, Fernando
    Escalona, Alex
    Perez, Gustavo
    Crovari, Fernando
    Guzman, Sergio
    Llanos, Osvaldo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2007, 135 (04) : 464 - 472
  • [5] Botulinum toxin injection vs laparoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia - Economic analysis of a randomized trial
    Zaninotto, G
    Vergadoro, V
    Annese, V
    Costantini, M
    Costantino, M
    Molena, D
    Rizzetto, C
    Epifani, M
    Ruol, A
    Nicoletti, L
    Ancona, E
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04): : 691 - 695
  • [6] Botulinum toxin injection versus laparoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: Economic analysis of a randomized trial
    G. Zaninotto
    V. Vergadoro
    V. Annese
    M. Costantini
    M. Costantino
    D. Molena
    C. Rizzetto
    M. Epifani
    A. Ruol
    L. Nicoletti
    E. Ancona
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 691 - 695
  • [7] The optimal initial approach to achalasia: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, thoracoscopic Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin injection?
    Urbach, DR
    Hansen, PD
    Swanstrom, LL
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A1061 - A1061
  • [8] A decision analysis of the optimal initial approach to achalasia: Laparoscopic heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, thoracoscopic heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin injection
    David R. Urbach
    Paul D. Hansen
    Yashodhan S. Khajanchee
    Lee L. Swanstrom
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2001, 5 : 192 - 205
  • [9] Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in the Treatment of Achalasia
    Rolinger, Jens
    Miller, Johanna
    Bolzenius, Rupert
    Granderath, Frank
    Kirschniak, Andreas
    Wilhelm, Peter
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2022, 147 (01): : 21 - 24
  • [10] A decision analysis of the optimal initial approach to achalasia: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, thoracoscopic Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin injection
    Urbach, DR
    Hansen, PD
    Khajanchee, YS
    Swanstrom, LL
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2001, 5 (02) : 192 - 205