Has the use of routine episiotomy decreased? Examination of episiotomy rates from 1983 to 2000

被引:42
|
作者
Goldberg, J
Holtz, D
Hyslop, T
Tolosa, JE
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Res Reprod Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Biostat Sect, Div Clin Pharmacol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2002年 / 99卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01756-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine if practice patterns have been altered by the large body of literature strongly advocating the selective use of episiotomy. METHODS: An electronic audit of the medical procedures database at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital from 1983 to 2000 was completed. Univariate and multivariable models were computed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall episiotomy rates in 34,048 vaginal births showed a significant reduction from 69.6% in 1983 to 19.4% in 2000. Significantly decreased risk of episiotomy was seen based upon year of childbirth (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86, 0.87), black race (OR 0.29, 954'o CI 0.28, 0.31), and spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.36, 0.45). Increased association with episiotomy was seen in forceps deliveries (OR 4.04, 95% CI 3.46, 4.72), and with third- or fourth-degree lacerations (OR 4.87,95% CI 4.38, 5.41). In deliveries with known insurance status, having Medicaid insurance was also associated with a decreased episiotomy risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54, 0.64). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant reduction in the overall episiotomy rate between 1983 and 2000. White women consistently underwent episiotomy more frequently than black women even when controlling for age, parity, insurance status, and operative vaginal delivery. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is routine use of episiotomy justified?
    Lede, RL
    Belizan, JM
    Carroli, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (05) : 1399 - 1402
  • [2] Episiotomy use has changed
    Weber, Anne M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (01) : E17 - E18
  • [3] The Need to Avoid the Routine Use of Episiotomy
    Tomasso, Giselle
    Althabe, Fernando
    Cafferata, Maria L.
    Aleman, Alicia
    Sosa, Claudio
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2006, 2 (02) : 99 - 102
  • [4] Episiotomy use has changed REPLY
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (01) : E18 - E18
  • [5] Routine use of episiotomy with forceps should not be encouraged
    Klein, Michael C.
    Kaczorowski, Janusz
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 192 (08) : E190 - E190
  • [6] EPISIOTOMY - CAN ITS ROUTINE USE BE DEFENDED
    THORP, JM
    BOWES, WA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (05) : 1027 - 1030
  • [7] Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics - Should it be performed?
    Myers-Helfgott, MG
    Helfgott, AW
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 26 (02) : 305 - +
  • [8] Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth
    Jiang, Hong
    Qian, Xu
    Carroli, Guillermo
    Garner, Paul
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (02):
  • [9] FIGO Statement: Restrictive use rather than routine use of episiotomy
    Nassar, Anwar H.
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo
    Rane, Ajay
    Gupta, Sandhya
    Barnea, Eytan
    de Bernis, Luc
    Di Renzo, Gian Carlo
    Escobar, Maria Fernanda
    Lloyd, Isabel
    Nassar, Anwar H.
    Nicholson, Wanda Kay
    Shah, P. K.
    Stones, William
    Sun, Luming
    Theron, Gerhard
    Walani, Salimah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 146 (01) : 17 - 19
  • [10] Episiotomy rates from eleven developing countries
    Kropp, N
    Hartwell, T
    Althabe, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (02) : 157 - 159