Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?

被引:225
|
作者
Kung, Franki Y. H. [1 ]
Kwok, Navio [1 ]
Brown, Douglas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
MECHANICAL TURK; THINKING TOO; DELIBERATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; REFLECTION; RESPONSES; QUALITY; WORKERS; BIASES;
D O I
10.1111/apps.12108
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Attention checks have become increasingly popular in survey research as a means to filter out careless respondents. Despite their widespread use, little research has empirically tested the impact of attention checks on scale validity. In fact, because attention checks can induce a more deliberative mindset in survey respondents, they may change the way respondents answer survey questions, posing a threat to scale validity. In two studies, we tested this hypothesis (N=816). We examined whether common attention checksinstructed-response items (Study 1) and an instructional manipulation check (Study 2)impact responses to a well-validated management scale. Results showed no evidence that they affect scale validity, both in reported scale means and tests of measurement invariance. These findings allow researchers to justify the use of attention checks without compromising scale validity and encourage future research to examine other survey characteristic-respondent dynamics to advance our use of survey methods.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 283
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Attention Please: Your Attention Check Questions in Survey Studies Can Be Automatically Answered
    Pei, Weiping
    Mayer, Arthur
    Tu, Kaylynn
    Yue, Chuan
    WEB CONFERENCE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW 2020), 2020, : 1182 - 1193
  • [3] Biased Attention to Threat: Answering Old Questions With Young Infants
    Burris, Jessica L.
    Oleas, Denise
    Reider, Lori
    Buss, Kristin A.
    Perez-Edgar, Koraly
    LoBue, Vanessa
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (06) : 534 - 539
  • [4] Construct validity of Williams' ostracism needs threat scale
    Gerber, J. P.
    Chang, Si-Hua
    Reimel, Hannah
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 115 : 50 - 53
  • [5] The role of attention bias to threat in anxiety: mechanisms, modulators and open questions
    Okon-Singer, Hadas
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 19 : 26 - 30
  • [6] CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE CREATIVE PERSONALITY SCALE OF THE ADJECTIVE CHECK LIST
    KADUSON, HG
    SCHAEFER, CE
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1991, 69 (02) : 601 - 602
  • [7] The Issue of Noncompliance in Attention Check Questions: False Positives in Instructed Response Items
    Silber, Henning
    Rossmann, Joss
    Gummer, Tobias
    FIELD METHODS, 2022, 34 (04) : 346 - 360
  • [8] COMREY VALIDITY CHECK SCALE AS A PREDICTOR OF RELIABLE PERSONALITY TEST DATA
    BOOTH, RF
    NORTON, RS
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1976, 36 (04) : 1063 - 1067
  • [9] Barkley Child Attention Scale Validity and Reliability Study
    Firat, Sumeyra
    Bolat, Gul Unsel
    Gul, Hesna
    Baytunca, Muharrem Burak
    Kardas, Burcu
    Aysev, Ayla
    Ercan, Eyup Sabri
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 31 (03): : 284 - 293
  • [10] POI - A VALIDITY CHECK
    GRAFF, RW
    BRADSHAW, HE
    DANISH, SJ
    AUSTIN, BA
    ALTEKRUS.M
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1970, 30 (02) : 429 - &