Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology

被引：7377
|
作者：
Gioia, Dennis A. [1 ]
Corley, Kevin G. [2 ]
Hamilton, Aimee L. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Management & Org, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Management, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Univ Denver, Dept Management, Daniels Coll Business, Denver, CO USA
来源：
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS | 2013年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词：
qualitative rigor; inductive research; grounded theory; new concept development; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; STRATEGIC CHANGE; KNOWLEDGE; SENSEMAKING; MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTS; EMERGENCE; DYNAMICS; MODEL; WORK;
D O I：
10.1177/1094428112452151
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
For all its richness and potential for discovery, qualitative research has been critiqued as too often lacking in scholarly rigor. The authors summarize a systematic approach to new concept development and grounded theory articulation that is designed to bring "qualitative rigor" to the conduct and presentation of inductive research.
引用
收藏
页码：15 / 31
页数：17
相关论文
共 50 条
12345