Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial

被引:134
|
作者
Finnerty, Dylan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McMahon, Aisling [1 ]
McNamara, John R. [1 ]
Hartigan, Sean D. [1 ]
Griffin, Michael [1 ]
Buggy, Donal J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Div Anaesthesiol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Dublin, Ireland
[3] EU COST Act 15204 Euro Periscope, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Cleveland Clin, Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
erector spinae plane block; quality of recovery; robotic-assisted thoracic surgery; serratus anterior plane block; video-assisted thoracic surgery; LUNG-CANCER; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; REGIONAL ANALGESIA; RECOVERY; PAIN; COMPLICATIONS; LOBECTOMY; VATS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Minimally invasive thoracic surgery causes significant postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block promise effective thoracic analgesia compared with systemically administered opioids, but have never been compared in terms of terms of quality of recovery and overall morbidity after minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to receive either single-shot ESP or SAP block before surgery using levobupivacaine 0.25%, 30 ml. The primary outcome was quality of patient recovery at 24 h, using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve (AUC) of pain verbal rating scale (VRS) over time, time to first opioid analgesia, postoperative 24 h opioid consumption, in-hospital comprehensive complication index (CCI) score and hospital stay. Results: The QoR-15 score was higher among ESP patients compared with those in the SAP group, mean (standard deviation): 114 (16) vs 102 (22) (P=0.02). Time (min) to first i.v. opioid analgesia in recovery was 32.6 (20.6) in ESP vs 12.7 (9.5) in SAP (P=0.003). AUC at rest was 92 (31) mm h(-1) vs 112 (35) in ESP and SAP (P=0.03), respectively, whereas AUC on deep inspiration was 107 mm h(-1) (32) vs 129 (32) in ESP and SAP (P=0.01), respectively. VRS pain on movement in ESP and SAP at 24 h was, median (25-75% range): 4 (2-4) vs 5 (3-6) (P=0.04), respectively. Opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively was 29 (31) vs 39 (34) (P=0.37). Median (25-75%) CCI in ESP and SAP was 1 (0-2) vs 4 (0-26) (P=0.03), whereas hospital stay was 3 (2-6) vs 6 (3-9) days (P=0.17), respectively. Conclusion: Compared with SAP, ESP provides superior quality of recovery at 24 h, lower morbidity, and better analgesia after minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 810
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for thoracic surgery: is two better than one?
    Tedesco, Mario
    Capuano, Paolo
    Toscano, Antonio
    Sepolvere, Giuseppe
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (09) : 842 - 844
  • [2] Erector spinae plane block for minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    Sethuraman, Raghuraman M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2024, 71 (07): : 1045 - 1046
  • [3] Postoperative Thoracic Pain Treatment: Serratus Anterior or Erector Spinae Plane Block?
    Ulgey, Ayse
    Pehlivan, Sibel Seckin
    Demir, Omer Faruk
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2021, 69 (06): : 570 - 576
  • [4] Serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy: A randomised controlled study
    Hassan, Mohamed Elsayed
    Wadod, Mohamed Abd Alfattah
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [5] A Randomized Trial to Compare Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management Following Thoracoscopic Surgery
    Ekinci, Mursel
    Ciftci, Bahadir
    Golboyu, Birzat Emre
    Demiraran, Yavuz
    Bayrak, Yusuf
    Tulgar, Serkan
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (06) : 1248 - 1254
  • [6] In reply: Erector spinae plane block for minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    Xin, Ling
    Feng, Yi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2024, 71 (07): : 1047 - 1048
  • [7] Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Plane Block in Breast Conserving Surgery: Α Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vanni, Gianluca
    Caiazza, Giordana
    Materazzo, Marco
    Storti, Generoso
    Pellicciaro, Marco
    Buonomo, Chiara
    Natoli, Silvia
    Fabbi, Eleonora
    Dauri, Mario
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (11) : 5667 - 5676
  • [8] Serratus Anterior Plane Block versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: Response to Sun et al
    Ekinci, Mursel
    Ciftci, Bahadir
    Golboyu, Birzat Emre
    Demiraran, Yavuz
    Bayrak, Yusuf
    Tulgar, Serkan
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (04) : 870 - 871
  • [9] Comparison Among Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Analgesia in Thoracotomy for Lung Surgery
    Das, Soumi
    Saha, Debjani
    Sen, Chaitali
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (12) : 4386 - 4392
  • [10] Utility of erector spinae plane block in thoracic surgery
    Naghmeh Pirsaharkhiz
    Kelly Comolli
    Wakana Fujiwara
    Susan Stasiewicz
    Jeanne M. Boyer
    Eileen V. Begin
    Adam J. Rubinstein
    Hayley R. Henderson
    John F. Lazar
    Thomas J. Watson
    Christopher M. Eger
    Christine T. Trankiem
    Debra G. Phillips
    Puja Gaur Khaitan
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 15