On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO

被引：206

作者：

Zohm, H. ^{[1
]}

Angioni, C. ^{[1
]}

Fable, E. ^{[1
]}

Federici, G. ^{[2
]}

Gantenbein, G. ^{[3
]}

Hartmann, T. ^{[1
]}

Lackner, K. ^{[1
]}

Poli, E. ^{[1
]}

Porte, L. ^{[4
]}

Sauter, O. ^{[4
]}

Tardini, G. ^{[1
]}

Ward, D. ^{[5
]}

Wischmeier, M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] EURATOM, MPI Plasma Phys, D-85748 Garching, Germany

[2] EFDA PPP&T Dept, D-85748 Garching, Germany

[3] EURATOM, IHM, KIT, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

[4] EURATOM, EPFL, CRPP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

[5] EURATOM, CCFE Culham, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England

来源：

NUCLEAR FUSION | 2013年 / 53卷 / 07期

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

DENSITY; CONFINEMENT; LIMITS;

D O I：

10.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073019

中图分类号：

O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];

学科分类号：

070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;

摘要：

The physics base for the ITER Physics Design Guidelines is reviewed in view of application to DEMO and areas are pointed out in which improvement is needed to arrive at a consistent set of DEMO Physics Design Guidelines. Amongst the proposed improvements, the area of power exhaust plays a crucial role since predictive capability of present-day models is low and this area is expected to play a major role in limiting DEMO designs due to the much larger value of P-tot/R in DEMO than in present-day devices and even ITER.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] PHYSICS GUIDELINES FOR THE COMPACT IGNITION TOKAMAK
SHEFFIELD, J
DORY, RA
HOULBERG, WA
UCKAN, NA
BELL, M
COLESTOCK, P
HOSEA, J
KAYE, S
PETRAVIC, M
POST, D
SCOTT, SD
YOUNG, KM
BURRELL, KH
OHYABU, N
STAMBAUGH, R
GREENWALD, M
LIEWER, P
ROSS, D
SINGER, C
WEITZNER, H
FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 10 (03): : 481 - 490
[2] The physics of DEMO
Ward, D. J.
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2010, 52 (12)
[3] Physics issues for demo
Horton, L. D.
FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 53 (2T) : 468 - 473
[4] Thermal radiation analysis of DEMO tokamak
Koncar, Bostjan
Draksler, Martin
Garrido, Oriol Costa
Meszaros, Botond
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 124 : 567 - 571
[5] Global Thermal Analysis of DEMO Tokamak
Garrido, O. Costa
Koncar, B.
Kosmrlj, S.
Bachmann, C.
Meszaros, B.
24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE, (NENE 2015), 2015,
[6] TOKAMAK PHYSICS
HAINES, MG
CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, 1984, 25 (04) : 331 - 353
[7] Integration of DEMO hazard piping into the tokamak building
Gliss, C.
Bachmann, C.
Ciattaglia, S.
Garcia, M.
Federici, G.
Koerber, M.
Moscato, I.
Riedl, F.
Palermo, I.
Utili, M.
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2021, 168
[8] Initial DEMO tokamak design configuration studies
Bachmann, Christian
Aiello, G.
Albanese, R.
Ambrosino, R.
Arbeiter, F.
Aubert, J.
Boccaccini, L.
Carloni, D.
Federici, G.
Fischer, U.
Kovari, M.
Li Puma, A.
Loving, A.
Maione, I.
Mattei, M.
Mazzone, G.
Meszaros, B.
Palermo, I.
Pereslavtsev, P.
Riccardo, V.
Sardain, P.
Taylor, N.
Villari, S.
Vizvary, Z.
Vaccaro, A.
Visca, E.
Wenninger, R.
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 98-99 : 1423 - 1426
[9] THE PHYSICS OF AN IGNITED TOKAMAK
TROYON, F
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1991, 14 (1-2) : 71 - 79
[10] The role of the spherical tokamak in clarifying tokamak physics
Morris, AW
Akers, RJ
Connor, JW
Counsell, GF
Fonck, RJ
Gryaznevich, MP
Gusev, V
Hender, TC
Kaye, SM
Maddison, GP
Majeski, R
Martin, TJ
McClements, KG
Medvedev, S
Peng, YKM
Roach, CM
Robinson, DC
Sharapov, S
Sykes, A
Valovic, M
Walsh, MJ
Wilson, HR
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1999, 41 : B191 - B207

← 1 2 3 4 5 →