Intraday volatility spillovers between spot and futures indices: Evidence from the Korean stock market

被引:38
|
作者
Kang, Sang Hoon [1 ]
Cheong, Chongcheul [2 ]
Yoon, Seong-Min [3 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Business Adm, Pusan, South Korea
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Business Econ & Management, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Econ, Pusan, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Bi-directional causality; Positive feedback; Self-organized criticality; Synchronization; Volatility spillover; LEAD-LAG RELATIONSHIP; HIGH-FREQUENCY DATA; PRICE DISCOVERY; CROSS-CORRELATIONS; VOLUME; CASH; ARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2013.01.017
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This study provides empirical evidence of the relationship between spot and futures markets in Korea. In particular, the study focuses on the volatility spillover relationship between spot and futures markets by using three high-frequency (10 min, 30 min, and 1 h time-scales) intraday data sets of KOSPI 200 spot and futures contracts. The results indicate a strong bi-directional causal relationship between futures and spot markets, suggesting that return volatility in the spot market can influence that in the futures market and vice versa. Thus, the results indicate that new information is reflected in futures and spot markets simultaneously. This bi-directional causal relationship provides market participants with important guidance on understanding the intraday information transmission between the two markets. Thus, on a given trading day, there may be sudden and sharp increases or decreases in return volatility in the Korean stock market as a result of positive feedback and synchronization of spot and futures markets. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1795 / 1802
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraday Volatility Spillovers between Index Futures and Spot Market: Evidence from China
    Zhou, Zhou
    Dong, Huiyan
    Wang, Shouyang
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2014, 2014, 31 : 721 - 730
  • [2] Volatility Spillovers between the Stock Index Futures and Its Underlying Spot Market in China
    Feng Jin
    Jiang Yang
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICMSE), 2013, : 1627 - 1632
  • [3] The connectedness and risk spillovers between bitcoin spot and futures markets: evidence from intraday data
    Cevik, Emrah Ismail
    Gunay, Samet
    Bugan, Mehmet Fatih
    Dibooglu, Sel
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022,
  • [4] Price discovery and volatility spillovers between futures and spot cotton market in China
    He, Xiao-Yan
    Zhang, Shu-Lin
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2013, 33 (07): : 1723 - 1728
  • [5] Intraday volatility and network topological properties in the Korean stock market
    Lee, Junghoon
    Youn, Janghyuk
    Chang, Woojin
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2012, 391 (04) : 1354 - 1360
  • [6] The Impact of Stock Index Futures on Spot Market Volatility
    Yao, Yao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SPORTS, ARTS AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, 2016, 54 : 1244 - 1247
  • [7] Intraday price discovery and volatility transmission between the dual-listed stock index futures and spot markets - new evidence from India
    Sundararajan, Sivakumar
    Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023,
  • [8] Stock market volatility spillovers: Evidence for Latin America
    Gamba-Santamaria, Santiago
    Eduardo Gomez-Gonzalez, Jose
    Luis Hurtado-Guarin, Jorge
    Fernando Melo-Velandia, Luis
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 20 : 207 - 216
  • [9] How does news flow affect cross-market volatility spillovers? Evidence from China's stock index futures and spot markets
    Zhou, Xinmiao
    Zhang, Junru
    Zhang, Zhaoyong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 73 : 196 - 213
  • [10] Volatility spillovers and the price of risk: Evidence from the Swiss stock market
    Jochum C.
    Empirical Economics, 1999, 24 (2) : 303 - 322