Endoscopic 'cold steel' versus laser dacryocystorhinostomy: completing the audit cycle

被引:14
|
作者
Lester, S. E. [1 ]
Robson, A. K. [2 ]
Bearn, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, ENT Dept, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[2] Cumberland Infirm, Carlisle, England
[3] Dr Grays Hosp, Elgin, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY | 2008年 / 122卷 / 09期
关键词
epiphora; dacryocystorhinostomy; endonasal;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215107001363
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Dacryocystorhinostomy via an endonasal route has been adopted in our department. This audit study describes and compares our results for external, laser endonasal and 'cold steel' endonasal techniques. Success was defined as a subjective report of eye watering being 'better' or 'cured'. Data were obtained from a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients undergoing primary dacryocystorhinostomy in our department. 'Gold standard': External dacryocystorhinostomy performed by a consultant ophthalmologist was taken as our gold standard. In our study, the success rate for external dacryocystorhinostomy was 94 per cent. First cycle - laser-assisted endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Our initial results for endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy produced a success rate of 64 per cent, which was significantly worse than that for external dacryocystorhinostomy. These results have been previously published. Change in practice: Evidence suggested that cold steel endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was more effective, and we adopted this as our technique of choice. Second cycle - cold steel endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Over a four-year period, 57 cases completed a full nine months' follow up. 93 per cent were completed as day cases and 39 per cent were performed under local anaesthetic. The success rate was 79 per cent (45/57). There was no difference in success rates when this procedure was compared with external dacryocystorhinostomy (p = 0.55). The type of anaesthetic used (i.e. local vs general) made no difference to the success rate (p = 0.93). Change in practice: Cold steel endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was as effective as the gold standard, i.e. external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy was significantly less successful than external dacryocystorhinostomy. Due to the benefits of decreased operating time,, lower morbidity and success under local anaesthetic, we recommend cold steel endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy as our procedure of choice for the treatment of epiphora.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 927
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laser Versus Cold Steel for Endoscopic Management of Subglottic Stenosis
    Liang, Kevin Y.
    Miller, Katherine M.
    Syed, Faez
    Li, Hong
    Tierney, William S.
    Nelson, Rebecca C.
    Benninger, Michael S.
    Bryson, Paul C.
    Lorenz, Robert R.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 171 (02) : 471 - 477
  • [2] The Outcome of Endonasal Endoscopic Versus Transcanalicular Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy
    Khalid, Amber
    Sultan, Sharjeel
    Khanzada, Mahtab Alam
    Wasif, Muhammad
    Bhatty, Ayoob
    Fatima, Aveen
    JOURNAL OF THE LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 23 (02): : 134 - 139
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC LASER DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    METSON, R
    WOOG, JJ
    PULIAFITO, CA
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1994, 104 (03): : 269 - 274
  • [4] EXTERNAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    Joshi, Vijay
    Titiyal, G. S.
    Gupta, Swati
    Lohani, Kavita
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (12): : 3185 - 3193
  • [5] External Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comparison
    Moras, Kuldeep
    Bhat, Mahesh
    Shreyas, C. S.
    Mendonca, Norman
    Pinto, George
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (02) : 182 - 186
  • [6] Gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies of "limited or no clinical value"(LONCV): Completing the audit cycle
    Littleford, SE
    Rembaken, BJ
    Cairns, A
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 204 : 29A - 29A
  • [7] An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle?
    Gnanalingham, J
    Gnanalingham, MG
    Gnanalingham, KK
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2001, 94 (06) : 288 - 289
  • [8] Results of Endoscopic Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy
    Yilmaz, Tolga
    Yilmaz, Ahu
    Mert, Metin
    Taskapili, Muhittin
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02): : 102 - 105
  • [9] External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy
    Häusler, R
    Caversaccio, M
    Jost, M
    Körner, F
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) : 647 - 648
  • [10] ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY VS KTP 532 LASER-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY
    Nayak, D. R.
    Hazarika, P.
    Rodrigues, R. A. W.
    Pillai, S.
    Balakrishnan, R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 57 (04) : 278 - 282