Restrictive fluid resuscitation in combination with damage control resuscitation: Time for adaptation

被引:62
|
作者
Duke, Marquinn D. [1 ]
Guidry, Chrissy [1 ]
Guice, Jordan [1 ]
Stuke, Lance [2 ]
Marr, Alan B. [2 ]
Hunt, John P. [2 ]
Meade, Peter [1 ]
McSwain, Norman E., Jr. [1 ]
Duchesne, Juan Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sect Trauma & Crit Care Surg, Dept Surg, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sect Trauma & Crit Care Surg, Dept Surg, New Orleans, LA USA
来源
关键词
Hemorrhage; restrictive fluid resuscitation; damage control resuscitation; UNCONTROLLED HEMORRHAGIC-SHOCK; ACUTE TRAUMATIC COAGULOPATHY; HYPOTENSIVE RESUSCITATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; SURVIVAL; INJURY; HYPOTHERMIA; LAPAROTOMY; MORTALITY; SWINE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318265ce1f
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Damage control resuscitation (DCR) conveys a survival advantage in patients with severe hemorrhage. The role of restrictive fluid resuscitation (RFR) when used in combination with DCR has not been elucidated. We hypothesize that RFR, when used with DCR, conveys an overall survival benefit for patients with severe hemorrhage. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis from January 2007 to May 2011 at a Level I trauma center. Inclusion criteria included penetrating torso injuries, systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, and managed with DCR and damage control surgery (DCS). There were two groups according to the quantity of fluid before DCS: (1) standard fluid resuscitation (SFR) greater than or equal to 150 mL of crystalloid; (2) RFR less than 150 mL of crystalloid. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred seven patients were included. Before DCS, 132 (43%) received less than 150 mL of crystalloids, grouped under RFR; and 175 (57%) received greater than or equal to 150 mL of crystalloids, grouped under SFR. Demographics and initial clinical characteristics were similar between the study groups. Compared with the SFR group, RFR patients received less fluid preoperatively (129 mL vs. 2,757 mL; p < 0.001), exhibited a lower intraoperative mortality (9% vs. 32%; p < 0.001), and had a shorter hospital length of stay (13 vs. 18 days; p = 0.02). Patients in the SFR group had a lower trauma intensive care unit mortality (5 vs. 12%; p = 0.03) but exhibited a higher overall mortality. Patients receiving RFR demonstrated a survival benefit, with an odds ratio for mortality of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.37Y0.91). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first civilian study that analyzes the impact of RFR in patients managed with DCR. Its use in conjunction with DCR for hypotensive trauma patients with penetrating injuries to the torso conveys an overall and early intraoperative survival benefit. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 674-678. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 678
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EARLY FLUID RESUSCITATION IN SEVERE TRAUMA Evidence for damage control resuscitation is lacking
    Wiles, Matthew D.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [2] Damage Control Resuscitation in Combination With Damage Control Laparotomy: A Survival Advantage
    Duchesne, Juan C.
    Kimonis, Katerina
    Marr, Alan B.
    Rennie, Kelly V.
    Wahl, Georgia
    Wells, Joel E.
    Islam, Tareq M.
    Meade, Peter
    Stuke, Lance
    Barbeau, James M.
    Hunt, John P.
    Baker, Christopher C.
    McSwain, Norman E., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [3] Damage Control Resuscitation
    Cap, Andrew P.
    Pidcoke, Heather F.
    Spinella, Philip
    Strandenes, Geir
    Borgman, Matthew A.
    Schreiber, Martin
    Holcomb, John
    Tien, Homer Chin-Nan
    Beckett, Andrew N.
    Doughty, Heidi
    Woolley, Tom
    Rappold, Joseph
    Ward, Kevin
    Reade, Michael
    Prat, Nicolas
    Ausset, Sylvain
    Kheirabadi, Bijan
    Benov, Avi
    Griffin, Edward P.
    Corley, Jason B.
    Simon, Clayton D.
    Fahie, Roland
    Jenkins, Donald
    Eastridge, Brian J.
    Stockinger, Zsolt
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2018, 183 : 36 - 43
  • [4] Damage Control Resuscitation
    不详
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2010, 113 (11): : 882 - 883
  • [5] Damage control resuscitation
    Leibner, Evan
    Andreae, Mark
    Galvagno, Samuel M., Jr.
    Scalea, Thomas
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 7 (01): : 5 - 13
  • [6] Damage control resuscitation
    Pohlman, Timothy H.
    Walsh, Mark
    Aversa, John
    Hutchison, Emily M.
    Olsen, Kristen P.
    Reed, R. Lawrence
    BLOOD REVIEWS, 2015, 29 (04) : 251 - 262
  • [7] Damage control resuscitation
    Briggs, Alexandra
    Askari, Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 33 : 218 - 221
  • [8] Damage control resuscitation
    Holcomb, John B.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 62 (06): : S36 - S37
  • [9] Damage Control Resuscitation
    Bogert, James N.
    Harvin, John A.
    Cotton, Bryan A.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (03) : 177 - 186
  • [10] Damage Control Resuscitation and Damage Control Surgery
    Annecke, Thorsten
    Tjardes, Thorsten
    Limper, Ulrich
    Wappler, Frank
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2024, 59 (06): : 340 - 352